Triple
T11054828
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Puerto Rico v. Branstad |
E261346
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kentucky v. Dennison |
E261345
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kentucky v. Dennison | Statement: [Puerto Rico v. Branstad, relatedCase, Kentucky v. Dennison]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kentucky v. Dennison Context triple: [Puerto Rico v. Branstad, relatedCase, Kentucky v. Dennison]
-
A.
Kentucky v. Dennison
chosen
Kentucky v. Dennison was an 1861 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that federal courts could not compel state governors to carry out interstate extradition.
-
B.
Chisholm v. Georgia
Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
-
C.
Ableman v. Booth
Ableman v. Booth was an 1859 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal supremacy over state courts in enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act before the Civil War.
-
D.
Tennessee v. Lane
Tennessee v. Lane is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to require states to provide accessible courthouses under the Americans with Disabilities Act as a valid enforcement of the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
E.
McPherson v. Blacker
McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa98650481908609c7c56bfa7902 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d798a0890481909c1d4f9d5b23f33a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e441a5b5a481908a6fdf5f8e9bca8b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:26 p.m.