Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Kentucky v. Dennison | Statement: [Puerto Rico v. Branstad, overruledHoldingOf, Kentucky v. Dennison]

Target entity: Kentucky v. Dennison
Context triple: [Puerto Rico v. Branstad, overruledHoldingOf, Kentucky v. Dennison]

• A. Kentucky v. Dennison chosen
  Kentucky v. Dennison was an 1861 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that federal courts could not compel state governors to carry out interstate extradition.
• B. Chisholm v. Georgia
  Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
• C. Ableman v. Booth
  Ableman v. Booth was an 1859 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal supremacy over state courts in enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act before the Civil War.
• D. Tennessee v. Lane
  Tennessee v. Lane is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to require states to provide accessible courthouses under the Americans with Disabilities Act as a valid enforcement of the Fourteenth Amendment.
• E. McPherson v. Blacker
  McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: overruledHoldingOf
Context triple: [Puerto Rico v. Branstad, overruledHoldingOf, Kentucky v. Dennison]

• A. overruledByStatute
  Indicates that a legal rule, decision, or principle has been superseded or invalidated by a later-enacted statute.
• B. overturnedDecisionOf chosen
  Indicates that one decision reversed, nullified, or set aside a previous decision.
• C. overturnedLaw
  Indicates that a previously established law has been invalidated or reversed, typically by a higher legal authority or court decision.
• D. wasOverturnedByCourt
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
• E. upheldBy
  Indicates that one entity is supported, maintained, or validated by another, often through approval, enforcement, or confirmation of its validity.
• F. None of above.