United States v. Cruikshank

E150291

United States v. Cruikshank was an 1876 U.S. Supreme Court decision that severely limited federal enforcement of civil rights protections, especially against racially motivated violence in the Reconstruction-era South.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (2)

Statements (51)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Reconstruction-era civil rights case
U.S. Supreme Court case
legal case
aroseFrom Colfax massacre
surface form: Colfax Massacre
concernsTopic Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
surface form: Fifteenth Amendment

First Amendment to the United States Constitution
surface form: First Amendment

Fourteenth Amendment
Second Amendment to the United States Constitution
surface form: Second Amendment

federal civil rights enforcement
racially motivated violence
state action doctrine
followedBy The Civil Rights Cases (1883)
surface form: Civil Rights Cases
hasChiefJustice Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite
surface form: Morrison R. Waite
hasCitation 92 U.S. 542
hasConcurrenceAuthor David Davis
Joseph P. Bradley
Nathan Clifford
Noah Haynes Swayne
Samuel Freeman Miller
Ward Hunt
William Strong
hasCountry United States of America
surface form: United States
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States
hasDecisionDate 1876
hasDocketNumber No. 89
hasFullCitation United States v. Cruikshank self-linksurface differs
surface form: United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
hasHistoricalImpact contributed to the rise of Jim Crow and racial terror by limiting federal prosecutions
weakened federal protection of Black citizens in the post-Civil War South
hasMajorityAuthor Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite
surface form: Morrison R. Waite
hasSeparateOpinionAuthor Nathan Clifford
hasSubjectArea civil rights law
constitutional law
criminal law
hasVote 9–0
hasYearOfEvent 1873
held The Fifteenth Amendment does not give the federal government general power to punish all interference with voting rights
The Fourteenth Amendment restrains only state action, not the actions of private individuals
The federal government could not use the Enforcement Act of 1870 to prosecute purely private conspiracies to violate civil rights absent state involvement
The right to assemble is protected from federal interference by the First Amendment but is not created by the Constitution
The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution and the Second Amendment restricts only the federal government
involvesDefendant Other white paramilitary members
William J. Cruikshank
involvesLocation Colfax, Louisiana
involvesPlaintiff United States government
involvesState Louisiana
involvesVictims African American freedmen
isConsidered a foundational case for the state action doctrine
a major setback for Reconstruction civil rights enforcement
limited federal power to protect African Americans from private racial violence
scope of the Enforcement Acts
precededBy Slaughter-House Cases

Referenced by (5)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Colfax massacre relatedCourtCase United States v. Cruikshank
Petition Clause citedInCase United States v. Cruikshank
Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite presidedOver United States v. Cruikshank
subject surface form: Morrison R. Waite
United States v. Cruikshank hasFullCitation United States v. Cruikshank self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
Colfax, Louisiana followedBy United States v. Cruikshank
subject surface form: Colfax massacre