United States v. Butler
E11198
United States v. Butler was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down key provisions of the New Deal’s Agricultural Adjustment Act as an unconstitutional use of federal taxing and spending power.
Aliases (3)
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
U.S. Supreme Court case
→
constitutional law case → landmark case → |
| areaOfLaw |
administrative law
→
constitutional law → tax law → |
| chiefJusticeAtTime |
Charles Evans Hughes
→
|
| citation |
297 U.S. 1
→
|
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted |
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution
→
Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution → |
| court |
Supreme Court of the United States
→
|
| decisionDate |
1936-01-06
→
|
| defendant |
Butler
→
|
| dissentingOpinionBy |
Benjamin N. Cardozo
→
Harlan F. Stone → Louis Brandeis → |
| firstPageInUnitedStatesReports |
1
→
|
| fullCaseName |
United States v. Butler
→
|
| holding |
Congress may not use its taxing and spending power to regulate matters reserved to the states
→
key provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 were unconstitutional → the Agricultural Adjustment Act’s processing taxes and benefit payments exceeded Congress’s constitutional authority → |
| impact |
constrained early New Deal agricultural policy
→
invalidated federal agricultural production control program → |
| jurisdiction |
United States
→
|
| lawApplied |
Taxing and Spending Clause
→
Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution → U.S. Constitution → |
| legalIssue |
constitutionality of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933
→
scope of the Taxing and Spending Clause → |
| majorityJusticesJoining |
Charles Evans Hughes
→
George Sutherland → Harlan F. Stone → James Clark McReynolds → Pierce Butler → Willis Van Devanter → |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Owen J. Roberts
→
|
| plaintiff |
United States
→
|
| precedentStatus |
partially superseded by later New Deal era decisions
→
|
| relatedConcept |
coercion of states through conditional spending
→
general welfare clause → |
| relatedHistoricalContext |
New Deal
→
|
| relatedLegislation |
Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933
→
|
| subsequentDevelopment |
later limited by Helvering v. Davis
→
later limited by Steward Machine Co. v. Davis → |
| topic |
federalism in the United States
→
limits on federal spending power → |
| volumeInUnitedStatesReports |
297
→
|
| yearDecided |
1936
→
|
Referenced by (13)
| Subject (surface form when different) | Predicate |
|---|---|
|
Agricultural Adjustment Administration
→
Steward Machine Co. v. Davis → |
relatedCase |
|
General Welfare Clause doctrine
→
Taxing and Spending Clause → |
significantCase |
|
Butler
("United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1 (1936)")
→
|
caseCitation |
|
General Welfare Clause doctrine
("United States v. Butler (1936)")
→
|
clarifiedIn |
|
AAA
→
|
declaredUnconstitutionalInCase |
|
United States v. Butler
→
|
fullCaseName |
|
Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933
→
|
legalChallenge |
|
Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act of 1936
("Supreme Court decision in United States v. Butler")
→
|
motivatedBy |
|
James Clark McReynolds
→
|
notableCase |
|
Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933
→
|
partiallyInvalidatedBy |
|
Butler
→
|
partyInCase |