legalDoctrine
P4756
predicate
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
All labels observed (43)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| legalDoctrine canonical | 138 |
| legalStandard | 44 |
| associatedWithLegalDoctrine | 27 |
| legalPrincipleEstablished | 25 |
| relatedLegalDoctrine | 20 |
| ruleOfLaw | 20 |
| legalMethodology | 18 |
| associatedLegalDoctrine | 17 |
| legalRuling | 15 |
| associatedLegalPrinciple | 12 |
| lawApplied | 12 |
| legalDoctrineAssociatedWith | 10 |
| legalDoctrineEstablished | 7 |
| legalPrincipleApplied | 7 |
| legalFormulation | 5 |
| legalDoctrineApplied | 4 |
| legalDoctrineAssociated | 4 |
| legalDoctrineInvolved | 4 |
| relatedLegalPrinciple | 4 |
| involvesLegalDoctrine | 3 |
| legalDoctrineAdvanced | 3 |
| juridicalMethod | 2 |
| legalArgumentBasis | 2 |
| legalDoctrineArticulated | 2 |
| legalDoctrineDiscussed | 2 |
| legalPrincipleAtIssue | 2 |
| legalPrincipleType | 2 |
| legalTestRestored | 2 |
| implicatedLegalDoctrine | 1 |
| juridicalOrientation | 1 |
| juridicalPrinciple | 1 |
| legalDoctrineEstablishedInCase | 1 |
| legalDoctrineExtended | 1 |
| legalDoctrineInvoked | 1 |
| legalDoctrineUsed | 1 |
| legalPrincipleAffirmed | 1 |
| legalPrincipleAffirmedByCourt | 1 |
| legalPrincipleAssociated | 1 |
| legalPrincipleAssociatedWith | 1 |
| legalPrincipleUsed | 1 |
| legalTheoryUsed | 1 |
| testInModernLaw | 1 |
| usesLegalDoctrine | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: legalDoctrine
Generated description
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
Sample triples (428)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| the_Crown_in_right_of_Belize | Crown_in_right_doctrine ⓘ |
| Washington v. Davis | Discriminatory purpose must be shown to prove racial discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause. via predicate surface "ruleOfLaw" ⓘ |
| Washington v. Davis | Statistical racial disparities are relevant but not sufficient by themselves to prove unconstitutional discrimination. via predicate surface "ruleOfLaw" ⓘ |
|
McLaurin was required to sit in designated segregated areas in classrooms, the library, and the cafeteria.
surface form:
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents
|
separate but equal ⓘ |
| Ex parte Endo | limits on executive wartime powers ⓘ |
| Ex parte Endo | statutory interpretation of War Relocation Authority powers ⓘ |
| Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. | proximate cause ⓘ |
| Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. | foreseeability ⓘ |
| Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. | duty of care is owed only to those in the reasonably foreseeable zone of danger via predicate surface "legalPrincipleEstablished" ⓘ |
| Joe Hogan | intermediate scrutiny for gender-based classifications via predicate surface "relatedLegalPrinciple" ⓘ |
| Joe Hogan | prohibition of gender-based admissions policies at public institutions without an exceedingly persuasive justification via predicate surface "relatedLegalPrinciple" ⓘ |
| Aboriginal peoples under the Constitution Act, 1982 | honour of the Crown via predicate surface "relatedLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Aboriginal peoples under the Constitution Act, 1982 | duty to consult and accommodate via predicate surface "relatedLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Aboriginal peoples under the Constitution Act, 1982 | Aboriginal title via predicate surface "relatedLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Aboriginal peoples under the Constitution Act, 1982 | inherent right of self-government via predicate surface "relatedLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Reynolds v. Sims decision | substantially equal population among legislative districts via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| Compact Clause of the United States Constitution | not all interstate agreements require explicit congressional consent ⓘ |
| Compact Clause of the United States Constitution | agreements that increase state power at the expense of federal supremacy generally require consent ⓘ |
| Coryell | Privileges and Immunities Clause via predicate surface "associatedWithLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| John H. Ferguson | racial segregation in public transportation via predicate surface "associatedWithLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Holy Crown of Hungary |
Holy Crown of Hungary
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Doctrine of the Holy Crown
|
| Terry v. Ohio | stop and frisk via predicate surface "legalDoctrineEstablished" ⓘ |
| Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala | basic structure doctrine via predicate surface "legalPrincipleEstablished" ⓘ |
| United States v. American Tobacco Co. | rule of reason ⓘ |
| Andrew Hamilton | truth as a defense to libel via predicate surface "legalDoctrineAdvanced" ⓘ |
| Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting | Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 via predicate surface "lawApplied" ⓘ |
| Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting |
Arizona Revised Statutes
via predicate surface "lawApplied"
ⓘ
surface form:
Legal Arizona Workers Act
|
| Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting | federal preemption doctrine via predicate surface "lawApplied" ⓘ |
| Inter caetera | papal donation ⓘ |
| Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | scienter required for private damages actions via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | transaction must be in connection with the purchase or sale of a security via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | reliance required in private actions via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | loss causation required in private actions via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | materiality of misstatement or omission required via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 | substantially lessen competition via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 | tend to create a monopoly via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| Al-Umm | Shafi'i usul al-fiqh via predicate surface "legalMethodology" ⓘ |
| Crown in right of Northern Ireland | The Crown in right of Northern Ireland via predicate surface "legalFormulation" ⓘ |
|
Duke Power Company
surface form:
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
|
disparate impact via predicate surface "legalDoctrineEstablished" ⓘ |
| Gerald Lynn Bostock | federal employment nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ workers via predicate surface "associatedLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Alexander v. Sandoval | implied private right of action ⓘ |
| Alexander v. Sandoval | statutory interpretation ⓘ |
| Minersville School District v. Gobitis | judicial deference to legislatures in matters of national unity ⓘ |
| J.D. Shelley | unenforceability of racially restrictive covenants under the Fourteenth Amendment via predicate surface "associatedWithLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Homma trial | command responsibility via predicate surface "legalDoctrineApplied" ⓘ |
| Miqat | pilgrims must not pass Miqat towards Mecca without ihram if intending Hajj or Umrah via predicate surface "legalRuling" ⓘ |
| Tequila | NOM-006-SCFI via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| Tawaf al-Ifadah | fard for Hajj via predicate surface "legalRuling" ⓘ |
| Willie S. Griggs | disparate impact via predicate surface "legalDoctrineAssociatedWith" ⓘ |
| Mary Beth Tinker | “substantial disruption” test for student speech via predicate surface "legalDoctrineAssociatedWith" ⓘ |