Triple
T7255242
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Homma trial |
E157701
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalDoctrineApplied |
P4756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | command responsibility |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: command responsibility | Statement: [Homma trial, legalDoctrineApplied, command responsibility]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalDoctrineApplied Context triple: [Homma trial, legalDoctrineApplied, command responsibility]
-
A.
legalDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
B.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
C.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
D.
legalCodeFocus
Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
-
E.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6882d81d4819085f7ff862951ee4f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6eaa0c76c81909fe43ed6938a13ea |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e7666ffc81908bf643d8257e6337 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:24 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:56 p.m.