Triple
T4651688
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joe Hogan |
E102307
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedLegalPrinciple |
P4756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | intermediate scrutiny for gender-based classifications |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: intermediate scrutiny for gender-based classifications | Statement: [Joe Hogan, relatedLegalPrinciple, intermediate scrutiny for gender-based classifications]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedLegalPrinciple Context triple: [Joe Hogan, relatedLegalPrinciple, intermediate scrutiny for gender-based classifications]
-
A.
relatedLegalSystem
Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
-
B.
legalConcept
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
legalBasis
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
E.
relatedLegislation
Indicates that there exists a legislative document that is connected to, affects, or is otherwise relevant to the subject entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43d71a308190afea7280841b0de8 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6632708c8190b627d99363ab062c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd620fc5e081908325ac8e6a6384ab |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:14 p.m.