Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914

E127993

United States federal statute antitrust law

The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 is a U.S. law that strengthened and clarified antitrust regulations by targeting specific anti-competitive practices and providing greater protections for labor unions and consumers.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Disambiguation Statements Elicitation Referenced by

All labels observed (3)

Label	Occurrences
Clayton Antitrust Act	16
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 canonical	3
Clayton Act	1

How this entity was disambiguated

This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1111146 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
Context triple: [Progressive Era, significantEvent, Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914]

A. Sherman Antitrust Act
The Sherman Antitrust Act is a landmark 1890 U.S. federal law that outlawed monopolistic business practices and formed the foundation of American antitrust policy.
B. Aldrich–Vreeland Act
The Aldrich–Vreeland Act was a 1908 U.S. law that created emergency currency provisions and laid groundwork for banking reform in response to the Panic of 1907.
C. Hepburn Act regulation of railroads
The Hepburn Act regulation of railroads was a landmark 1906 U.S. law that greatly strengthened federal oversight of railroad rates and practices by expanding the powers of the Interstate Commerce Commission.
D. Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935
The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 was a New Deal-era U.S. federal law that restructured and regulated electric and gas utility holding companies to curb monopolistic practices and protect consumers and investors.
E. Rogers Act of 1924
The Rogers Act of 1924 was a U.S. law that unified and professionalized the country’s diplomatic and consular services into a single merit-based Foreign Service.
F. None of above. chosen
G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
Target entity description: The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 is a U.S. law that strengthened and clarified antitrust regulations by targeting specific anti-competitive practices and providing greater protections for labor unions and consumers.

A. Sherman Antitrust Act
The Sherman Antitrust Act is a landmark 1890 U.S. federal law that outlawed monopolistic business practices and formed the foundation of American antitrust policy.
B. Aldrich–Vreeland Act
The Aldrich–Vreeland Act was a 1908 U.S. law that created emergency currency provisions and laid groundwork for banking reform in response to the Panic of 1907.
C. Hepburn Act regulation of railroads
The Hepburn Act regulation of railroads was a landmark 1906 U.S. law that greatly strengthened federal oversight of railroad rates and practices by expanding the powers of the Interstate Commerce Commission.
D. Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935
The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 was a New Deal-era U.S. federal law that restructured and regulated electric and gas utility holding companies to curb monopolistic practices and protect consumers and investors.
E. Rogers Act of 1924
The Rogers Act of 1924 was a U.S. law that unified and professionalized the country’s diplomatic and consular services into a single merit-based Foreign Service.
F. None of above. chosen

Statements (46)

Predicate	Object
instanceOf	United States federal statute ⓘ antitrust law ⓘ
administeredBy	Federal Trade Commission ⓘ
allows	injunctive relief for private parties ⓘ private right of action for treble damages ⓘ
amendedBy	Celler-Kefauver Act ⓘ surface form: Celler–Kefauver Act of 1950 Hart–Scott–Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act ⓘ surface form: Hart–Scott–Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976
appliesTo	interstate commerce ⓘ
clarifies	Sherman Antitrust Act ⓘ surface form: Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
consumerProtectionAspect	aims to prevent practices that harm consumers through reduced competition ⓘ
country	United States of America ⓘ surface form: United States
dateEnacted	1914-10-15 ⓘ
enactedBy	United States Congress ⓘ
enforcedBy	United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division ⓘ
fullName	Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 self-linksurface differs ⓘ surface form: Clayton Antitrust Act
historicalContext	Progressive Era economic regulation in the United States ⓘ
jurisdiction	United States government ⓘ surface form: United States federal government
laborProvision	exempts labor unions from being treated as illegal combinations in restraint of trade ⓘ protects the right of workers to organize ⓘ
legalStandard	substantially lessen competition ⓘ tend to create a monopoly ⓘ
legislativeBody	63rd United States Congress ⓘ
namedAfter	Henry De Lamar Clayton Jr. ⓘ
purpose	to prohibit specific anti-competitive practices ⓘ to protect competition ⓘ to protect consumers ⓘ to provide greater protections for labor unions ⓘ to strengthen and supplement the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 ⓘ
regulates	corporate governance practices affecting competition ⓘ mergers and acquisitions ⓘ
relationshipToOtherLaw	supplements the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 ⓘ works alongside the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 ⓘ
section	Section 2 ⓘ Section 3 ⓘ Section 7 ⓘ Section 8 ⓘ
shortName	Clayton Act provisions ⓘ surface form: Clayton Act
signedBy	Woodrow Wilson ⓘ
subjectMatter	competition law ⓘ merger control ⓘ unfair methods of competition ⓘ
targetsPractice	certain mergers and acquisitions that may substantially lessen competition ⓘ exclusive dealing contracts ⓘ interlocking directorates ⓘ price discrimination ⓘ tying arrangements ⓘ

How these facts were elicited