Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman
E87373
Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Virginia’s residency requirement for bar admission on motion as a violation of the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
Aliases (1)
Statements (26)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
→
court case → |
| appliesTo |
out-of-state attorneys seeking admission on motion in Virginia
→
|
| areaOfLaw |
bar admission
→
constitutional law → professional responsibility → |
| constitutionalProvision |
Article IV Privileges and Immunities Clause
→
Article IV, Section 2 of the United States Constitution → |
| country |
United States
→
|
| court |
Supreme Court of the United States
→
|
| decisionDate |
1988
→
|
| fullCaseName |
Supreme Court of Virginia et al. v. Friedman
→
|
| holding |
A state may not condition bar admission on motion on state residency when the applicant is already admitted elsewhere and otherwise qualified
→
Virginia’s residency requirement for bar admission on motion violated the Privileges and Immunities Clause → |
| jurisdiction |
United States
→
|
| legalIssue |
Privileges and Immunities Clause
→
bar admission on motion → state residency requirement for bar admission → |
| outcome |
state residency requirement for bar admission on motion struck down
→
|
| petitioner |
Supreme Court of Virginia
→
|
| relevance |
clarifies scope of Privileges and Immunities protections for practicing law
→
limits state discrimination against nonresidents in professional licensing → |
| respondent |
Friedman
→
|
| stateInvolved |
Virginia
→
|
| typeOfRestrictionChallenged |
residency requirement for bar admission on motion
→
|
| yearDecided |
1988
→
|
Referenced by (2)
| Subject (surface form when different) | Predicate |
|---|---|
|
Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman
("Supreme Court of Virginia et al. v. Friedman")
→
|
fullCaseName |
|
Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper
→
|
relatedCase |