Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman

E87373

Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Virginia’s residency requirement for bar admission on motion as a violation of the Privileges and Immunities Clause.


Statements (26)
Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
court case
appliesTo out-of-state attorneys seeking admission on motion in Virginia
areaOfLaw bar admission
constitutional law
professional responsibility
constitutionalProvision Article IV Privileges and Immunities Clause
Article IV, Section 2 of the United States Constitution
country United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1988
fullCaseName Supreme Court of Virginia et al. v. Friedman
holding A state may not condition bar admission on motion on state residency when the applicant is already admitted elsewhere and otherwise qualified
Virginia’s residency requirement for bar admission on motion violated the Privileges and Immunities Clause
jurisdiction United States
legalIssue Privileges and Immunities Clause
bar admission on motion
state residency requirement for bar admission
outcome state residency requirement for bar admission on motion struck down
petitioner Supreme Court of Virginia
relevance clarifies scope of Privileges and Immunities protections for practicing law
limits state discrimination against nonresidents in professional licensing
respondent Friedman
stateInvolved Virginia
typeOfRestrictionChallenged residency requirement for bar admission on motion
yearDecided 1988

Referenced by (2)
Subject (surface form when different) Predicate
Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman ("Supreme Court of Virginia et al. v. Friedman")
fullCaseName
Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper
relatedCase

Please wait…