Triple

T3913262
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman E87373 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Supreme Court of Virginia et al. v. Friedman E87373 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court of Virginia et al. v. Friedman | Statement: [Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman, fullCaseName, Supreme Court of Virginia et al. v. Friedman]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Supreme Court of Virginia et al. v. Friedman
Context triple: [Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman, fullCaseName, Supreme Court of Virginia et al. v. Friedman]
  • A. Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman chosen
    Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Virginia’s residency requirement for bar admission on motion as a violation of the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
  • B. Boynton v. Virginia
    Boynton v. Virginia was a 1960 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended federal prohibitions against racial discrimination in interstate bus terminals, helping lay the legal groundwork for the Freedom Rides.
  • C. Virginia v. Black
    Virginia v. Black is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a ban on cross burning carried out with intent to intimidate while clarifying the limits of First Amendment protection for hate speech and symbolic expression.
  • D. McDonald v. Smith
    McDonald v. Smith is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the First Amendment’s Petition Clause does not grant absolute immunity from libel suits for statements made in petitions to government officials.
  • E. Ware v. Hylton
    Ware v. Hylton was a 1796 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal treaties override conflicting state laws, helping to establish the authority of the national government under the Constitution.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed9424514819086e9c58adde6652d completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeed37b19c81908e690c495d96607f completed March 9, 2026, 3:54 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b5285c52808190b9cbb2e3e03a18cb completed March 14, 2026, 9:20 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:22 p.m.