Toulmin model of argumentation
E311218
The Toulmin model of argumentation is a framework for analyzing and constructing arguments by breaking them into components such as claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal.
All labels observed (8)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Toulmin model of argument | 2 |
| Toulmin model of argumentation canonical | 2 |
| Toulmin method | 1 |
| Toulmin model: backing | 1 |
| Toulmin model: claim | 1 |
| Toulmin model: qualifier | 1 |
| Toulmin model: rebuttal | 1 |
| Toulmin model: warrant | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T2939209 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Toulmin model of argumentation Context triple: [Stephen Toulmin, knownFor, Toulmin model of argumentation]
-
A.
On the Influence of Authority in Matters of Opinion
On the Influence of Authority in Matters of Opinion is a 19th-century philosophical treatise examining how deference to authority shapes belief, judgment, and public opinion.
-
B.
Essays in Persuasion
Essays in Persuasion is a collection of economic and political essays by John Maynard Keynes, in which he analyzes and argues for policy responses to the major issues of his time, including the aftermath of World War I and the Great Depression.
-
C.
The Logic of Practice
The Logic of Practice is a major sociological work by Pierre Bourdieu that develops his influential theories of habitus, field, and symbolic power to explain how social practices are structured and reproduced.
-
D.
Logic: The Theory of Inquiry
Logic: The Theory of Inquiry is John Dewey’s major work on logic, presenting a pragmatic account of reasoning as an experimental, inquiry-driven process grounded in experience.
-
E.
The Appeal to Reason
The Appeal to Reason was a prominent early 20th-century American socialist newspaper known for its mass circulation and influential role in the U.S. left-wing movement.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Toulmin model of argumentation Target entity description: The Toulmin model of argumentation is a framework for analyzing and constructing arguments by breaking them into components such as claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal.
-
A.
On the Influence of Authority in Matters of Opinion
On the Influence of Authority in Matters of Opinion is a 19th-century philosophical treatise examining how deference to authority shapes belief, judgment, and public opinion.
-
B.
Essays in Persuasion
Essays in Persuasion is a collection of economic and political essays by John Maynard Keynes, in which he analyzes and argues for policy responses to the major issues of his time, including the aftermath of World War I and the Great Depression.
-
C.
The Logic of Practice
The Logic of Practice is a major sociological work by Pierre Bourdieu that develops his influential theories of habitus, field, and symbolic power to explain how social practices are structured and reproduced.
-
D.
Logic: The Theory of Inquiry
Logic: The Theory of Inquiry is John Dewey’s major work on logic, presenting a pragmatic account of reasoning as an experimental, inquiry-driven process grounded in experience.
-
E.
The Appeal to Reason
The Appeal to Reason was a prominent early 20th-century American socialist newspaper known for its mass circulation and influential role in the U.S. left-wing movement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
argumentation model
ⓘ
framework for argument analysis ⓘ theory of argument ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs |
Toulmin argument model
ⓘ
Toulmin model of argumentation ⓘ
surface form:
Toulmin method
|
| componentDefinition_backing | support for the warrant ⓘ |
| componentDefinition_claim | conclusion whose merits are to be established ⓘ |
| componentDefinition_data | facts or evidence used to support the claim ⓘ |
| componentDefinition_qualifier | statement indicating the strength of the claim ⓘ |
| componentDefinition_rebuttal | conditions under which the claim does not hold ⓘ |
| componentDefinition_warrant | reasoning that connects data to the claim ⓘ |
| contrastsWith | formal deductive logic ⓘ |
| critiquedFor |
limited treatment of emotional appeals
ⓘ
underemphasizing dialogical aspects of argument ⓘ |
| describedIn | The Uses of Argument ⓘ |
| emphasizes |
context-dependent justification
ⓘ
practical reasoning ⓘ |
| field |
argumentation theory
ⓘ
communication studies ⓘ informal logic ⓘ philosophy of argument ⓘ rhetoric ⓘ |
| focusesOn |
structure of everyday arguments
ⓘ
warrants underlying claims ⓘ |
| hasComponent |
backing
ⓘ
claim ⓘ data ⓘ qualifier ⓘ rebuttal ⓘ warrant ⓘ |
| influenced |
models of legal reasoning
ⓘ
modern argumentation theory ⓘ pedagogy of argumentative writing ⓘ |
| influencedBy | British analytic philosophy ⓘ |
| namedAfter | Stephen Toulmin ⓘ |
| proposedBy | Stephen Toulmin ⓘ |
| publicationYear | 1958 ⓘ |
| purpose |
analyzing arguments
ⓘ
constructing arguments ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Stephen Toulmin's theory of reasoning
ⓘ
informal logic movement ⓘ pragma-dialectics ⓘ |
| usedIn |
academic writing instruction
ⓘ
composition studies ⓘ critical thinking education ⓘ debate education ⓘ legal argumentation ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Toulmin model of argumentation Description of subject: The Toulmin model of argumentation is a framework for analyzing and constructing arguments by breaking them into components such as claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal.
Referenced by (10)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.