pragma-dialectics

E1041504

Pragma-dialectics is a theory of argumentation that views argumentative discourse as a critical discussion aimed at resolving differences of opinion through rational dialogue governed by explicit rules.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (52)

Predicate Object
instanceOf approach to argumentation
research program in argumentation theory
theory of argumentation
aimsAt resolution of differences of opinion
appliesTo everyday argumentation
legal argumentation
political argumentation
scientific argumentation
basedOn dialectics
pragmatics
characterizedBy rule-governed argumentative discourse
combines dialectical perspective on critical discussion
pragmatic perspective on language use
countryOfOrigin Netherlands
developedAt University of Amsterdam NERFINISHED
developedBy Frans H. van Eemeren NERFINISHED
Rob Grootendorst NERFINISHED
emphasizes procedural rules for discussion
rational dialogue
field argumentation theory
focusesOn analysis of argumentative moves
evaluation of argumentative discourse
normative standards for argumentation
goal reasonable resolution of disputes
hasStage argumentation stage
concluding stage
confrontation stage
opening stage
influencedBy classical dialectic
informal logic
speech act theory
interpretsFallaciesAs violations of discussion rules
introducesConcept critical discussion model
four stages of critical discussion
language Dutch
English
opposes purely formal-logical views of argumentation
purely rhetorical views of argumentation
proposes ten rules for critical discussion
provides normative model for argumentative discourse
ruleType argument scheme rule
burden of proof rule
closure rule
freedom rule
relevance rule
standpoint rule
starting point rule
unexpressed premise rule
usage rule
validity rule
usedFor analyzing fallacies
viewsArgumentationAs critical discussion

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Toulmin model of argumentation relatedTo pragma-dialectics