Triple
T38344626
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | pragma-dialectics |
E1041504
|
entity |
| Predicate | interpretsFallaciesAs |
P198689
|
FINISHED |
| Object | violations of discussion rules |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: violations of discussion rules | Statement: [pragma-dialectics, interpretsFallaciesAs, violations of discussion rules]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: interpretsFallaciesAs Context triple: [pragma-dialectics, interpretsFallaciesAs, violations of discussion rules]
-
A.
misinterpretedBy
Indicates that something (such as a statement, action, or signal) is understood incorrectly or in a way not intended by a particular entity.
-
B.
interpretiveConsequence
Indicates that one entity is a conclusion, implication, or interpretive outcome that follows from another entity.
-
C.
parityInterpretation
Indicates that one entity is interpreted or classified in terms of its parity (e.g., as even or odd) relative to another entity or a given parity scheme.
-
D.
allegoricalInterpretation
Indicates that one entity is interpreted as symbolically representing deeper, often moral or spiritual, meanings within another entity (such as a text, image, or event).
-
E.
disputedInterpretation
Indicates that there is disagreement or contention over how something should be understood, interpreted, or explained.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e2ad95481908c920c0e5c1c3e26 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fefb15220081908da36aac386fa582 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fefa8e8ad48190a723fed81e9d64d0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:12 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fefb13eb288190bcfae0541cfd7b98 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.