Triple
T13455460
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Toulmin model of argumentation |
E311218
|
entity |
| Predicate | componentDefinition_warrant |
P109573
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reasoning that connects data to the claim |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reasoning that connects data to the claim | Statement: [Toulmin model of argumentation, componentDefinition_warrant, reasoning that connects data to the claim]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: componentDefinition_warrant Context triple: [Toulmin model of argumentation, componentDefinition_warrant, reasoning that connects data to the claim]
-
A.
warrantyClause
Indicates that a contractual provision defines the scope, conditions, and duration of a warranty obligation between parties.
-
B.
warrantyType
Indicates the specific category or kind of warranty associated with a product, service, or agreement.
-
C.
componentsDefinition
Indicates that one entity defines or specifies the components that make up another entity.
-
D.
hasWarrantyDisclaimer
Indicates that a product, service, or agreement includes a statement limiting or denying warranties or liability.
-
E.
haveWarranty
Indicates that one entity provides or is covered by a warranty in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806a938b8819097ec43a2229fc7f9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbaefc52448190b30d7999f44a9765 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9a03ce03481908c61094f0cc0c158 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:13 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dadce235f88190a6433395d2969811 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 11:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:41 p.m.