Triple
T13455178
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stephen Toulmin |
E311211
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Toulmin model: qualifier |
E311218
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Toulmin model: qualifier | Statement: [Stephen Toulmin, hasPart, Toulmin model: qualifier]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Toulmin model: qualifier Context triple: [Stephen Toulmin, hasPart, Toulmin model: qualifier]
-
A.
Toulmin
Toulmin is the surname of Stephen Toulmin, a prominent British philosopher best known for his work on argumentation and the Toulmin model of reasoning.
-
B.
Toulmin model of argumentation
chosen
The Toulmin model of argumentation is a framework for analyzing and constructing arguments by breaking them into components such as claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal.
-
C.
The Uses of Argument
The Uses of Argument is a foundational work in informal logic and argumentation theory in which Stephen Toulmin introduces his influential model for analyzing practical reasoning.
-
D.
Gricean maxims
Gricean maxims are a set of conversational principles proposed by philosopher H. P. Grice that explain how speakers and listeners cooperate to communicate meaning effectively and implicature beyond literal words.
-
E.
Hempel's paradox
Hempel's paradox is a famous problem in the philosophy of science that challenges our intuitions about confirmation by showing how evidence seemingly unrelated to a hypothesis can still count as confirming it.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806a938b8819097ec43a2229fc7f9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbaefc52448190b30d7999f44a9765 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:41 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f7399e33008190b10c14f30ff0c0d2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:41 p.m.