Triple
T13455458
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Toulmin model of argumentation |
E311218
|
entity |
| Predicate | componentDefinition_claim |
P11064
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conclusion whose merits are to be established |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conclusion whose merits are to be established | Statement: [Toulmin model of argumentation, componentDefinition_claim, conclusion whose merits are to be established]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: componentDefinition_claim Context triple: [Toulmin model of argumentation, componentDefinition_claim, conclusion whose merits are to be established]
-
A.
definesClaim
chosen
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the meaning, scope, or content of another entity’s claim.
-
B.
makesClaim
Indicates that one entity asserts, states, or puts forward a claim about another entity or about some proposition.
-
C.
scopeClaim
Indicates that a claim or statement applies within a specified scope, context, or boundary.
-
D.
claimsToBe
Indicates that one entity asserts or declares itself to have a particular identity, role, or property, regardless of whether this assertion is true.
-
E.
supportsClaim
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, reasoning, or backing that strengthens or validates the truth or credibility of another entity’s claim.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806a938b8819097ec43a2229fc7f9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbaefc52448190b30d7999f44a9765 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9a03ce03481908c61094f0cc0c158 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:41 p.m.