Triple

T13455461
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Toulmin model of argumentation E311218 entity
Predicate componentDefinition_backing P109574 FINISHED
Object support for the warrant LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: support for the warrant | Statement: [Toulmin model of argumentation, componentDefinition_backing, support for the warrant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: componentDefinition_backing
Context triple: [Toulmin model of argumentation, componentDefinition_backing, support for the warrant]
  • A. componentsDefinition
    Indicates that one entity defines or specifies the components that make up another entity.
  • B. backingRequirement
    Indicates that one entity must provide support, endorsement, or financial backing for another as a prerequisite or condition.
  • C. coreDefinition
    Indicates the fundamental, central meaning or essence that defines something at its most basic level.
  • D. backing
    Indicates providing support, endorsement, or financial/resources assistance to someone or something, often enabling or strengthening their actions or position.
  • E. backedFor
    Indicates that one entity provides support, endorsement, or backing for another entity, often in a financial, political, or strategic context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806a938b8819097ec43a2229fc7f9 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbaefc52448190b30d7999f44a9765 completed April 12, 2026, 2:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9a03ce03481908c61094f0cc0c158 completed April 11, 2026, 1:13 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dadce235f88190a6433395d2969811 completed April 11, 2026, 11:44 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:41 p.m.