Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
E932061
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Planned Parenthood v. Danforth canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T11531285 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Planned Parenthood v. Danforth Context triple: [Warren Burger Court, notableCase, Planned Parenthood v. Danforth]
-
A.
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
-
B.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
-
C.
Doe v. Bolton
Doe v. Bolton is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Roe v. Wade, expanded and defined the scope of abortion rights by striking down restrictive state regulations.
-
D.
Roe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade was a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that recognized a constitutional right to abortion, profoundly shaping American law and politics until it was overturned in 2022.
-
E.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Planned Parenthood v. Danforth Target entity description: Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
-
A.
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
-
B.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
-
C.
Doe v. Bolton
Doe v. Bolton is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Roe v. Wade, expanded and defined the scope of abortion rights by striking down restrictive state regulations.
-
D.
Roe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade was a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that recognized a constitutional right to abortion, profoundly shaping American law and politics until it was overturned in 2022.
-
E.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
landmark abortion rights case ⓘ |
| arguedDate |
1976-01-12
ⓘ
1976-01-13 ⓘ |
| citation | 428 U.S. 52 ⓘ |
| concurrenceBy |
Justice Potter Stewart
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Justice Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvision | Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| decidingCourt | Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1976-07-01 ⓘ |
| dissentBy |
Justice Byron R. White
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Justice William H. Rehnquist NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 74-1151 ⓘ |
| fullCaseName | Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasJurisdiction | United States NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| holding |
Ban on saline amniocentesis abortion method after the first trimester is unconstitutional
ⓘ
Certain Missouri abortion regulations were unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ Parental consent requirement for abortion for minors is unconstitutional as written ⓘ Recordkeeping and reporting requirements for abortions are largely constitutional ⓘ Requirement that a woman sign a detailed consent form is constitutional ⓘ Spousal consent requirement for abortion is unconstitutional ⓘ |
| issue |
Whether Missouri could ban certain abortion methods
ⓘ
Whether Missouri could impose specific informed consent and recordkeeping rules ⓘ Whether Missouri could require parental consent for minors seeking abortions ⓘ Whether Missouri could require spousal consent for abortions ⓘ |
| joinedByInMajority |
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Justice John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice Potter Stewart NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalSubject |
abortion
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ reproductive rights ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Justice Harry A. Blackmun NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| originatingJurisdiction | State of Missouri NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| petitioner | Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| reliesOnPrecedent | Roe v. Wade NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| respondent | John C. Danforth NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| respondentRole | Attorney General of Missouri NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| result |
Certain other Missouri abortion regulations upheld in part
ⓘ
Missouri parental consent provision invalidated ⓘ Missouri spousal consent provision invalidated ⓘ |
| stateLawChallenged | Missouri abortion statute of 1974 ⓘ |
| subsequentCitation |
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| volume | 428 ⓘ |
| year | 1976 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Planned Parenthood v. Danforth Description of subject: Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.