Disambiguation evidence for Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) via surface form

"Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association"

As subject (51)

Triples where this entity appears as subject under the label "Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association".

Predicate Object
alsoKnownAs Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) ⓘ
surface form: Murphy v. NCAA
alsoKnownAs Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) ⓘ
surface form: Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.
arguedOn December 4, 2017 ⓘ
challengedStatute Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act ⓘ
challengedStatuteAbbreviation PASPA ⓘ
citation 584 U.S. ___ (2018) ⓘ
concerns Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
concerns federalism ⓘ
concerns state-authorized sports gambling ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decidedOn May 14, 2018 ⓘ
dissentingOpinionBy Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
dissentingOpinionBy Sonia Sotomayor ⓘ
docketNumber No. 16-476 ⓘ
effect Allowed individual U.S. states to legalize and regulate sports betting. ⓘ
effect Significantly expanded states’ rights under the anti-commandeering doctrine. ⓘ
holding Congress cannot issue direct orders to state legislatures to maintain prohibitions on sports gambling. ⓘ
holding PASPA’s provision prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling is not severable from the rest of the statute. ⓘ
holding The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment. ⓘ
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
instanceOf landmark decision ⓘ
jurisdiction United States federal law ⓘ
legalIssue constitutionality of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act ⓘ
legalIssue scope of the anti-commandeering doctrine ⓘ
locationOfCourt Washington, D.C. ⓘ
majorityJoinedBy Anthony M. Kennedy NERFINISHED ⓘ
majorityJoinedBy Clarence Thomas NERFINISHED ⓘ
majorityJoinedBy Elena Kagan ⓘ
majorityJoinedBy John G. Roberts Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ
majorityJoinedBy Neil M. Gorsuch ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Samuel A. Alito Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ
originatedFrom Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association ⓘ
partlyJoinedBy Stephen G. Breyer NERFINISHED ⓘ
petitioner Phil Murphy ⓘ
surface form: Philip D. Murphy
petitioner State of New Jersey NERFINISHED ⓘ
proceduralHistory New Jersey’s 2014 law partially repealing prohibitions on sports wagering was enjoined by lower federal courts under PASPA. ⓘ
proceduralHistory supreme court ⓘ
surface form: The Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the Third Circuit’s decision.
proceduralHistory United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ⓘ
surface form: The Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld PASPA and the injunction against New Jersey’s law.
relatedDoctrine anti-commandeering doctrine ⓘ
relatedPrecedent New York v. United States (1992) ⓘ
relatedPrecedent Printz v. United States ⓘ
surface form: Printz v. United States (1997)
replacedParty Chris Christie ⓘ
respondent National Basketball Association ⓘ
respondent National Collegiate Athletic Association ⓘ
respondent National Football League ⓘ
respondent National Hockey League ⓘ
respondent MLB Commissioner’s Office ⓘ
surface form: Office of the Commissioner of Baseball
respondent United States of America ⓘ
surface form: United States
result PASPA was struck down as unconstitutional. ⓘ
subjectMatter sports betting regulation in the United States ⓘ
vote 6–3 on the core anti-commandeering question ⓘ

As object (2)

Triples where some other subject referred to this entity as "Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association".

Printz v. United States → citedIn →
"Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association"
↳ resolves to Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018)
ⓘ
Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States → relatedCase →
"Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association"
↳ resolves to Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018)
ⓘ