Parker v. District of Columbia (2007)

E734919

Parker v. District of Columbia (2007) is a landmark federal appellate court decision that struck down Washington, D.C.’s handgun ban and laid the groundwork for the Supreme Court’s recognition of an individual Second Amendment right in District of Columbia v. Heller.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Second Amendment case
United States federal appellate court case
landmark court decision
affects federal constitutional law on firearms
gun control laws in the District of Columbia
appellateOutcome district court judgment reversed in part
challengesLaw D.C. requirement that firearms in the home be kept unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock
District of Columbia handgun ban
citationStyle Parker v. District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007) NERFINISHED
directlyLeadsTo District of Columbia v. Heller NERFINISHED
dissentReason plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the D.C. gun laws
hasCitation 478 F.3d 370
hasCourt United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit NERFINISHED
hasDecisionDate March 9, 2007
hasDefendant District of Columbia NERFINISHED
hasDissentBy Karen LeCraft Henderson NERFINISHED
hasJurisdiction District of Columbia Circuit NERFINISHED
hasMajorityOpinionBy Judge Laurence H. Silberman NERFINISHED
hasMajorityOpinionJoinedBy Thomas B. Griffith NERFINISHED
hasPanelJudge Karen LeCraft Henderson NERFINISHED
Laurence H. Silberman NERFINISHED
Thomas B. Griffith NERFINISHED
hasPlaintiff Shelly Parker NERFINISHED
other D.C. residents
hasProceduralPosture appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
hasSubjectMatter Second Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
hasSubsequentCaseName District of Columbia v. Heller NERFINISHED
hasSubsequentHistory appeal taken to the United States Supreme Court
hasYear 2007
held D.C. requirements that firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional violate the Second Amendment
the District of Columbia’s handgun ban violates the Second Amendment
the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms
influenced Supreme Court’s recognition of an individual Second Amendment right in District of Columbia v. Heller
interprets Second Amendment as securing an individual right unconnected with militia service
involvesConstitutionalProvision Second Amendment NERFINISHED
involvesLocation Washington, D.C. NERFINISHED
isLandmarkFor gun rights jurisprudence in the United States
individual-right interpretation of the Second Amendment
lowerCourtDecision United States District Court for the District of Columbia upheld the D.C. gun laws NERFINISHED
precedentFor District of Columbia v. Heller NERFINISHED
rejectsInterpretation collective-rights-only view of the Second Amendment
result D.C. handgun ban struck down as unconstitutional
D.C. storage requirements for firearms struck down as unconstitutional
topic constitutionality of handgun bans
scope of the right to keep and bear arms
wasAffirmedAsToResultIn District of Columbia v. Heller NERFINISHED

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Judge Laurence Silberman notableCase Parker v. District of Columbia (2007)
subject surface form: Laurence Silberman