Triple

T29093319
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Parker v. District of Columbia (2007) E734919 entity
Predicate dissentReason P166306 FINISHED
Object plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the D.C. gun laws LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the D.C. gun laws | Statement: [Parker v. District of Columbia (2007), dissentReason, plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the D.C. gun laws]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dissentReason
Context triple: [Parker v. District of Columbia (2007), dissentReason, plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the D.C. gun laws]
  • A. dissentingJustice
    Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
  • B. dissentClaimed
    Indicates that an entity has expressed disagreement or opposition to a claim made by another entity.
  • C. dissentingOpinionConcern
    Indicates that one party holds a differing or opposing view and expresses concern or disagreement regarding another party’s position, decision, or statement.
  • D. dissentingVoteBy
    Indicates that a particular vote was cast in opposition to the majority or prevailing decision by a specific entity.
  • E. standardDiscussedInDissent
    Indicates that a particular legal standard is examined or addressed within the dissenting opinion of a judicial decision.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b0ed66481908f2e864fa550d2f1 completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6617f43748190b4880e1da320cdaa completed May 2, 2026, 8:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f65c2376a08190be5215171e908e69 completed May 2, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65f75ac608190a62cd6afce14f68e completed May 2, 2026, 8:32 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:06 a.m.