Edelman v. Jordan
E496715
Edelman v. Jordan is a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of federal court relief against state officials under the Eleventh Amendment, refining the doctrine established in Ex parte Young.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Edelman v. Jordan canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T5127228 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Edelman v. Jordan Context triple: [Ex parte Young, relatedCase, Edelman v. Jordan]
-
A.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
B.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
C.
Romer v. Evans
Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
-
D.
Mathews v. Eldridge
Mathews v. Eldridge is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established a three-factor balancing test for determining what procedural safeguards due process requires in administrative proceedings.
-
E.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Edelman v. Jordan Target entity description: Edelman v. Jordan is a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of federal court relief against state officials under the Eleventh Amendment, refining the doctrine established in Ex parte Young.
-
A.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
B.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
C.
Romer v. Evans
Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
-
D.
Mathews v. Eldridge
Mathews v. Eldridge is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established a three-factor balancing test for determining what procedural safeguards due process requires in administrative proceedings.
-
E.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
civil rights case ⓘ federal courts case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
federal courts ⓘ welfare law ⓘ |
| citation | 415 U.S. 651 ⓘ |
| clarified | that a federal court order requiring payment of past-due benefits from the state treasury is treated as a suit against the state ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInvolved |
Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1974-03-25 ⓘ |
| dissentingJustices |
Justice Harry A. Blackmun
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Justice Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| followedBy | subsequent Eleventh Amendment jurisprudence on state sovereign immunity ⓘ |
| fullCaseName | Edelman, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Aid v. Jordan NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| holding |
Federal courts may grant prospective injunctive relief against state officials under Ex parte Young but may not award retroactive monetary awards payable from state funds.
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
The Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to pay retroactive monetary relief from the state treasury for past violations of federal law. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | United States federal jurisdiction ⓘ |
| keyPrinciple | Prospective compliance with federal law may be compelled from state officials, but the Eleventh Amendment protects states from federal court orders requiring payment of past liabilities from the state treasury. ⓘ |
| languageOfCourt | English ⓘ |
| legalDoctrine |
Ex parte Young doctrine
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
retroactive monetary relief ⓘ state sovereign immunity ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
availability of retroactive welfare benefits in federal court
ⓘ
scope of federal court relief against state officials ⓘ |
| limitedScopeOf | federal court relief against state officials ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| page | 651 ⓘ |
| petitioner | Jerome H. Edelman NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| precedentFor |
distinction between prospective and retroactive relief under the Eleventh Amendment
ⓘ
limits on retroactive monetary relief against states in federal court ⓘ |
| refinesDoctrine | Ex parte Young NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatesToProgram | Aid to the Aged, Blind, or Disabled (AABD) NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| respondent | Charles L. Jordan NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| stateParty | Illinois NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
federal-state relations
ⓘ
public assistance benefits ⓘ |
| typeOfReliefAtIssue |
injunctive relief
ⓘ
retroactive monetary relief ⓘ |
| volume | 415 ⓘ |
| vote | 6–3 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1974 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Edelman v. Jordan Description of subject: Edelman v. Jordan is a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of federal court relief against state officials under the Eleventh Amendment, refining the doctrine established in Ex parte Young.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.