Triple
T20358584
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edelman v. Jordan |
E496715
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Edelman, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Aid v. Jordan |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Edelman, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Aid v. Jordan | Statement: [Edelman v. Jordan, fullCaseName, Edelman, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Aid v. Jordan]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Edelman, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Aid v. Jordan Context triple: [Edelman v. Jordan, fullCaseName, Edelman, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Aid v. Jordan]
-
A.
Edelman v. Jordan
chosen
Edelman v. Jordan is a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of federal court relief against state officials under the Eleventh Amendment, refining the doctrine established in Ex parte Young.
-
B.
Bradwell v. Illinois
Bradwell v. Illinois is an 1873 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a state's right to bar women from practicing law, marking an early setback for women's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
C.
Scott v. Illinois
Scott v. Illinois is a 1979 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to appointed counsel applies only when a defendant is actually sentenced to imprisonment, thereby limiting the broader protections suggested in Argersinger v. Hamlin.
-
D.
Edwards v. Balisok
Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
-
E.
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a3f7f48190b37f354574028ca6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e67855c3a88190b88839a47d01184d |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:25 a.m.