Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Ex parte Young | Statement: [Edelman v. Jordan, refinesDoctrine, Ex parte Young]

Target entity: Ex parte Young
Context triple: [Edelman v. Jordan, refinesDoctrine, Ex parte Young]

• A. Ex parte Young chosen
  Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
• B. Learned Hand
  Learned Hand was a highly influential American federal judge renowned for his incisive opinions on constitutional and tax law and his lasting impact on U.S. jurisprudence.
• C. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
  Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer is a landmark 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential power by ruling that President Truman lacked authority to seize steel mills during the Korean War without congressional approval.
• D. De Jonge v. Oregon
  De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
• E. Ex parte McCardle
  Ex parte McCardle is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case best known for affirming Congress’s power to limit the Court’s appellate jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: refinesDoctrine
Context triple: [Edelman v. Jordan, refinesDoctrine, Ex parte Young]

• A. reinforcedDoctrine
  Indicates that one entity strengthened, supported, or further entrenched a particular doctrine or set of beliefs in another entity or context.
• B. definedDoctrineAt
  Indicates that a particular doctrine was formally established, articulated, or codified at a specific place or time.
• C. proposesDoctrine
  Indicates that one entity formally puts forward or advocates a particular doctrine, theory, or set of principles for consideration or adoption by others.
• D. extendsDoctrineTo
  Indicates that a doctrine, principle, or rule is applied or carried over from one context, entity, or domain to another, broadening its scope or coverage.
• E. sharesDoctrine
  Indicates that two entities adhere to or promote the same doctrine, belief system, or set of principles.
• F. None of above. chosen