Standing Bear v. Crook

E440067

Standing Bear v. Crook was an 1879 U.S. federal court case in which Ponca chief Standing Bear successfully argued that Native Americans are "persons" under the law and entitled to habeas corpus rights.

Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States federal court case
civil rights case
habeas corpus case
appealStatus not appealed
background Standing Bear and a group of Ponca left Indian Territory to return to Nebraska NERFINISHED
The Ponca had been forcibly removed from their Nebraska homeland to Indian Territory NERFINISHED
The U.S. Army arrested Standing Bear and his followers for leaving the reservation without permission
chronology The case was heard in 1879 after the Ponca removal to Indian Territory in the 1870s
citationStatus trial court decision
counselForDefense George H. Roberts NERFINISHED
counselForPlaintiff Andrew J. Poppleton NERFINISHED
John L. Webster NERFINISHED
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court United States District Court for the District of Nebraska NERFINISHED
decisionDate 1879
decisionYear 1879
defendantRole George Crook was a U.S. Army general NERFINISHED
hasDefendant George Crook NERFINISHED
United States Army NERFINISHED
hasPlaintiff Standing Bear NERFINISHED
holding Native Americans are entitled to seek writs of habeas corpus in federal court
Native Americans are persons within the meaning of U.S. law
Standing Bear and his band were being held illegally and must be released
involvedEthnicGroup Ponca NERFINISHED
involvedLeader Standing Bear NERFINISHED
jurisdiction federal
keyQuote “That hand is not the color of yours, but if I pierce it, I shall feel pain.”
“The law protects all persons in this country.”
languageOfProceedings English
legalIssue civil rights of Native Americans
habeas corpus
status of Native Americans as persons under U.S. law
legalSignificance Challenged the federal government’s treatment of Native Americans as wards without legal standing
First federal court decision to recognize Native Americans as persons under U.S. law with the right to sue for habeas corpus
Marked an important step in the recognition of Native American civil rights
location Omaha, Nebraska NERFINISHED
presidingJudge Elmer S. Dundy NERFINISHED
procedure A writ of habeas corpus was sought on behalf of Standing Bear and his followers
relatedTo Ponca removal
U.S. Indian policy in the 19th century
history of Native American civil rights
result Standing Bear and his followers were released from military custody
The Ponca were allowed to remain in Nebraska
state Nebraska
subjectMatter civil liberties
constitutional law
federal Indian law
timePeriod Reconstruction era and post–Civil War United States

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Ponca involvedIn Standing Bear v. Crook