Breedlove v. Suttles
E421913
Breedlove v. Suttles was a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state poll taxes as constitutional, reinforcing barriers to voting until later overturned during the civil rights era.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Breedlove v. Suttles canonical | 2 |
| Nolan Breedlove v. S. Guyt McCall, Tax Collector of Fulton County, Georgia, et al., substituted by Suttles | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T4210896 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Breedlove v. Suttles Context triple: [Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, overruledPrecedent, Breedlove v. Suttles]
-
A.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
B.
Downes v. Bidwell
Downes v. Bidwell is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped establish the "Insular Cases" doctrine, holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control.
-
C.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
D.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
E.
Luther v. Borden
Luther v. Borden is an 1849 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "political question" doctrine by holding that the determination of a state's legitimate government under the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause is a matter for Congress, not the courts.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Breedlove v. Suttles Target entity description: Breedlove v. Suttles was a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state poll taxes as constitutional, reinforcing barriers to voting until later overturned during the civil rights era.
-
A.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
B.
Downes v. Bidwell
Downes v. Bidwell is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped establish the "Insular Cases" doctrine, holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control.
-
C.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
D.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
E.
Luther v. Borden
Luther v. Borden is an 1849 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "political question" doctrine by holding that the determination of a state's legitimate government under the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause is a matter for Congress, not the courts.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
court decision ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
civil rights law
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ election law ⓘ |
| citation |
302 U.S. 277
ⓘ
58 S. Ct. 205 ⓘ 82 L. Ed. 252 ⓘ |
| civilRightsEraSignificance | example of pre–civil rights era Supreme Court deference to discriminatory voting laws ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted |
Equal Protection Clause
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ |
| country | United States of America ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1937-12-06 ⓘ |
| decisionType | unanimous decision ⓘ |
| effectOnLaw | validated state authority to impose poll taxes before the Twenty-Fourth Amendment ⓘ |
| fullName |
Breedlove v. Suttles
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Nolan Breedlove v. S. Guyt McCall, Tax Collector of Fulton County, Georgia, et al., substituted by Suttles
|
| historicalContext | Jim Crow era voting restrictions in the American South ⓘ |
| holding |
Georgia’s poll tax requirement was upheld as constitutional
ⓘ
state poll taxes as a prerequisite to voting do not violate the U.S. Constitution ⓘ |
| impact |
provided constitutional support for Jim Crow–era voting restrictions
ⓘ
reinforced barriers to voting for poor and minority citizens ⓘ upheld use of poll taxes in state elections ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States government
ⓘ
surface form:
United States federal government
|
| languageOfDecision | English ⓘ |
| laterOverruledBy | Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
constitutionality of state poll tax
ⓘ
voting rights and poll tax ⓘ |
| legalSystem | common law ⓘ |
| originatingState | Georgia ONNED1 ⓘ |
| overrulingDate | 1966 ⓘ |
| petitioner | Nolan Breedlove ONNED2 ⓘ |
| precedentialStatus | binding precedent until overruled ⓘ |
| publication | United States Reports ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Twenty-Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| respondent | Suttles, Tax Collector of Fulton County, Georgia ONNED2 ⓘ |
| shortName | Breedlove v. Suttles NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| stateLawInvolved | Georgia poll tax law ONNED2 ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
poll tax
ⓘ
voter qualification ⓘ |
| subsequentDevelopment |
poll taxes in federal elections prohibited by the Twenty-Fourth Amendment
ⓘ
poll taxes in state elections held unconstitutional in Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections ⓘ |
| term | October Term 1937 ⓘ |
| timePeriod | interwar period in United States history ⓘ |
| voteRequirementAddressed | payment of poll tax as condition to vote ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Breedlove v. Suttles Description of subject: Breedlove v. Suttles was a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state poll taxes as constitutional, reinforcing barriers to voting until later overturned during the civil rights era.
Referenced by (3)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
this entity surface form:
Nolan Breedlove v. S. Guyt McCall, Tax Collector of Fulton County, Georgia, et al., substituted by Suttles