Triple

T17355030
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 383 U.S. 663 E421911 entity
Predicate overruledPrecedent P2251 FINISHED
Object Breedlove v. Suttles E421913 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Breedlove v. Suttles | Statement: [383 U.S. 663, overruledPrecedent, Breedlove v. Suttles]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Breedlove v. Suttles
Context triple: [383 U.S. 663, overruledPrecedent, Breedlove v. Suttles]
  • A. Breedlove v. Suttles chosen
    Breedlove v. Suttles was a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state poll taxes as constitutional, reinforcing barriers to voting until later overturned during the civil rights era.
  • B. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • C. Groves v. Slaughter
    Groves v. Slaughter was an 1841 U.S. Supreme Court case under the Taney Court that addressed state power to restrict the importation of enslaved people and the limits of the Commerce Clause.
  • D. Downes v. Bidwell
    Downes v. Bidwell is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped establish the "Insular Cases" doctrine, holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control.
  • E. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889d520008190a26917a95bf1c2ea completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e43a2f26548190a8822b2470ec3c72 completed April 19, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a01955c37b48190bcef819e106005d2 completed May 11, 2026, 8:37 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:44 a.m.