Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers

E403700

Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act’s restrictions on partisan political activities by federal employees.

All labels observed (3)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf First Amendment case
United States Supreme Court case
constitutional law case
labor law–related case
landmark case
citation 413 U.S. 548
country United States of America
surface form: United States
decidingCourt Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1973-06-25
decisionYear 1973
defendant National Association of Letter Carriers
other federal employee unions
dissentBy Thurgood Marshall
effect affirmed the federal government’s authority to restrict partisan political activity by its employees.
provided guidance on the permissible scope of political activity restrictions for public employees.
fullName Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers self-link
holding The Court held that the government may place certain limits on the partisan political activities of federal employees to protect the integrity and efficiency of the public service.
The Court rejected facial challenges that the Hatch Act provisions were unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.
Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers self-linksurface differs
surface form: The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act’s restrictions on partisan political activities by federal employees.
involvesIssue freedom of association of public employees
freedom of speech of public employees
overbreadth doctrine
restrictions on partisan political activities by federal employees
vagueness doctrine
involvesStatute Hatch Act of 1939
joinedByInMajority Harry A. Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Potter Stewart
Warren E. Burger
William H. Rehnquist
William J. Brennan Jr.
William O. Douglas
jurisdiction federal
languageOfProceedings English
legalSubject First Amendment to the United States Constitution
surface form: First Amendment

administrative law
constitutional law
election law
public employment law
majorityOpinionBy Byron R. White
pageInUnitedStatesReports 548
plaintiff Civil Service Commission
surface form: United States Civil Service Commission
relatedToCase Broadrick v. Oklahoma
United Public Workers v. Mitchell
Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers self-linksurface differs
surface form: United States Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers (lower court proceedings)
shortName National Association of Letter Carriers
surface form: Letter Carriers
topic balance between government interests and employee speech rights
political neutrality of the civil service
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 413

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

United Public Workers v. Mitchell relatedCase Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers
Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers fullName Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers self-link
Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers holding Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act’s restrictions on partisan political activities by federal employees.
Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers relatedToCase Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: United States Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers (lower court proceedings)