Broadrick v. Oklahoma
E1223848
UNEXPLORED
Broadrick v. Oklahoma is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld restrictions on partisan political activities by state employees and helped define the modern overbreadth doctrine in First Amendment law.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Broadrick v. Oklahoma canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16616188 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Broadrick v. Oklahoma Context triple: [Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers, relatedToCase, Broadrick v. Oklahoma]
-
A.
McGirt v. Oklahoma
McGirt v. Oklahoma is a landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed much of eastern Oklahoma remains Native American reservation land for purposes of federal criminal jurisdiction.
-
B.
Eddings v. Oklahoma
Eddings v. Oklahoma is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that in capital sentencing the sentencer must consider all relevant mitigating evidence, including a defendant’s youth and troubled background.
-
C.
Skinner v. Oklahoma
Skinner v. Oklahoma is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law mandating the sterilization of certain criminal offenders, recognizing procreation as a fundamental right under the Equal Protection Clause.
-
D.
Thompson v. Oklahoma
Thompson v. Oklahoma is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held executing offenders who were under 16 at the time of their crimes violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
-
E.
State of Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson
State of Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson was the state party, acting through its Attorney General, that defended Oklahoma’s Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act in the U.S. Supreme Court case Skinner v. Oklahoma.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Broadrick v. Oklahoma Target entity description: Broadrick v. Oklahoma is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld restrictions on partisan political activities by state employees and helped define the modern overbreadth doctrine in First Amendment law.
-
A.
McGirt v. Oklahoma
McGirt v. Oklahoma is a landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed much of eastern Oklahoma remains Native American reservation land for purposes of federal criminal jurisdiction.
-
B.
Eddings v. Oklahoma
Eddings v. Oklahoma is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that in capital sentencing the sentencer must consider all relevant mitigating evidence, including a defendant’s youth and troubled background.
-
C.
Skinner v. Oklahoma
Skinner v. Oklahoma is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law mandating the sterilization of certain criminal offenders, recognizing procreation as a fundamental right under the Equal Protection Clause.
-
D.
Thompson v. Oklahoma
Thompson v. Oklahoma is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held executing offenders who were under 16 at the time of their crimes violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
-
E.
State of Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson
State of Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson was the state party, acting through its Attorney General, that defended Oklahoma’s Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act in the U.S. Supreme Court case Skinner v. Oklahoma.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers
→
relatedToCase
→
Broadrick v. Oklahoma
ⓘ