New York Times Co. v. United States

E33467

United States Supreme Court case landmark First Amendment case prior restraint case

New York Times Co. v. United States is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers, sharply limiting the government’s power to impose prior restraint on the media.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Disambiguation Statements Elicitation Referenced by

All labels observed (4)

Label	Occurrences
New York Times Co. v. United States canonical	13
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan	1
Pentagon Papers case	1
United States v. Washington Post Co.	1

How this entity was disambiguated

This entity first appeared as the object of triple T252941 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: New York Times Co. v. United States
Context triple: [First Amendment to the United States Constitution, hasLandmarkCase, New York Times Co. v. United States]

A. Printz v. United States
Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
B. Schenck v. United States
Schenck v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the “clear and present danger” test, allowing the government to restrict speech during wartime.
C. United States v. Nixon
United States v. Nixon was a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential privilege and compelled President Richard Nixon to release the Watergate tapes, reinforcing the principle that not even the president is above the law.
D. Gitlow v. New York
Gitlow v. New York is a 1925 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a major step in applying First Amendment free speech protections to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
E. Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
F. None of above. chosen
G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: New York Times Co. v. United States
Target entity description: New York Times Co. v. United States is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers, sharply limiting the government’s power to impose prior restraint on the media.

A. Printz v. United States
Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
B. Schenck v. United States
Schenck v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the “clear and present danger” test, allowing the government to restrict speech during wartime.
C. United States v. Nixon
United States v. Nixon was a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential privilege and compelled President Richard Nixon to release the Watergate tapes, reinforcing the principle that not even the president is above the law.
D. Gitlow v. New York
Gitlow v. New York is a 1925 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a major step in applying First Amendment free speech protections to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
E. Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
F. None of above. chosen

Statements (56)

Predicate	Object
instanceOf	United States Supreme Court case ⓘ landmark First Amendment case ⓘ prior restraint case ⓘ
alsoKnownAs	New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ surface form: Pentagon Papers case
areaOfLaw	First Amendment law ⓘ constitutional law ⓘ freedom of the press ⓘ national security law ⓘ
chiefJusticeAtTime	Warren E. Burger ⓘ
citation	29 L. Ed. 2d 822 ⓘ 403 U.S. 713 ⓘ 91 S. Ct. 2140 ⓘ
concurringOpinionBy	Byron R. White ⓘ Hugo L. Black ⓘ Potter Stewart ⓘ Thurgood Marshall ⓘ William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ William O. Douglas ⓘ
constitutionalPrinciple	heavy presumption against the constitutional validity of prior restraints ⓘ
constitutionalProvision	First Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
country	United States of America ⓘ surface form: United States
court	Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate	1971-06-30 ⓘ
decisionType	per curiam opinion ⓘ
dissentingJustice	Harry A. Blackmun ⓘ John M. Harlan II ⓘ Warren E. Burger ⓘ
dissentingOpinionBy	Harry A. Blackmun ⓘ John M. Harlan II ⓘ Warren E. Burger ⓘ
dissentingVote	3 ⓘ
docketNumber	1873 ⓘ 1885 ⓘ
documentAtIssue	Pentagon Papers ⓘ
historicalSignificance	Limited the federal government’s ability to use national security as a justification for prior restraint. ⓘ Strengthened protections for press freedom in the United States. ⓘ
holding	First Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ surface form: The First Amendment severely limits the government’s power to enjoin publication of news by the press. The government did not meet the heavy burden required to justify a prior restraint on publication. ⓘ
justiceInMajority	Byron R. White ⓘ Hugo L. Black ⓘ Potter Stewart ⓘ Thurgood Marshall ⓘ William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ William O. Douglas ⓘ
legalIssue	freedom of the press vs. national security ⓘ prior restraint ⓘ
majorityVote	6 ⓘ
opinionAuthor	per curiam (unsigned) ⓘ
PentagonPapersDescription	A classified Department of Defense study of U.S. political and military involvement in Vietnam from 1945 to 1967. ⓘ
petitioner	The New York Times Company ⓘ surface form: New York Times Company
relatedCase	United States v. Washington Post Co. ⓘ
relatedParty	The Washington Post Company ⓘ
respondent	United States of America ⓘ surface form: United States
result	Injunctions against the New York Times and Washington Post were vacated. ⓘ
subjectMatter	publication of the Pentagon Papers ⓘ
term	1970 Term ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (16)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

First Amendment to the United States Constitution → hasLandmarkCase → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

Espionage Act of 1917 → usedInCase → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

William J. Brennan Jr. → notableWork → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

this entity surface form: New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

Pentagon Papers → legalCase → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

this entity surface form: United States v. Washington Post Co.

New York Times Co. v. United States → alsoKnownAs → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

this entity surface form: Pentagon Papers case

United States v. Daniel Ellsberg → relatedCase → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court → hasNotableCase → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

United States – Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967: A Study Prepared by the Department of Defense → relatedCourtCase → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

United States – Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967: A Study Prepared by the Department of Defense → usedIn → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

Near v. Minnesota → relatedCase → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

United States v. Washington Post Co. → relatedCase → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

United States v. Washington Post Co. → consolidatedWith → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

Warren Burger Court → notableCase → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

Burger Court → notableCase → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

United States Supreme Court cases → hasPart → New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ

All labels observed (4)

How this entity was disambiguated Show

Statements (56)

How these facts were elicited Show

Referenced by (16)

How this entity was disambiguated

How these facts were elicited