Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act
E31184
The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act is a U.S. federal law that expands hate crime protections to include crimes motivated by a victim’s actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability and strengthens federal enforcement of such offenses.
All labels observed (4)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T241396 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act Context triple: [Civil Rights Division, legalAuthority, Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act]
-
A.
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act is a 1993 U.S. federal law that aims to protect individuals’ religious practices from substantial government burdens unless justified by a compelling governmental interest pursued through the least restrictive means.
-
B.
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act is a U.S. federal law that protects individuals, religious institutions, and prisoners from government actions that substantially burden their religious exercise, particularly in land use and institutional settings.
-
C.
DeBoer v. Snyder
DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
-
D.
Shelby County v. Holder
Shelby County v. Holder is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by striking down the formula used to determine which jurisdictions required federal preclearance for changes to their voting laws.
-
E.
Loving v. Virginia
Loving v. Virginia is a landmark 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down state laws banning interracial marriage, affirming marriage as a fundamental right under the Fourteenth Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act Target entity description: The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act is a U.S. federal law that expands hate crime protections to include crimes motivated by a victim’s actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability and strengthens federal enforcement of such offenses.
-
A.
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act is a 1993 U.S. federal law that aims to protect individuals’ religious practices from substantial government burdens unless justified by a compelling governmental interest pursued through the least restrictive means.
-
B.
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act is a U.S. federal law that protects individuals, religious institutions, and prisoners from government actions that substantially burden their religious exercise, particularly in land use and institutional settings.
-
C.
DeBoer v. Snyder
DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
-
D.
Shelby County v. Holder
Shelby County v. Holder is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by striking down the formula used to determine which jurisdictions required federal preclearance for changes to their voting laws.
-
E.
Loving v. Virginia
Loving v. Virginia is a landmark 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down state laws banning interracial marriage, affirming marriage as a fundamental right under the Fourteenth Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States federal law
ⓘ
hate crime law ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs |
Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act
ⓘ
surface form:
Matthew Shepard Act
Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act ⓘ
surface form:
Shepard–Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act
|
| amends | 18 U.S.C. § 249 ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
attempts to cause bodily injury using a dangerous weapon
ⓘ
violent crimes causing bodily injury ⓘ |
| authorizes |
federal investigation of certain hate crimes
ⓘ
federal prosecution of certain hate crimes ⓘ |
| category |
civil rights legislation
ⓘ
criminal law ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| covers |
crimes motivated by actual characteristics of the victim
ⓘ
crimes motivated by perceived characteristics of the victim ⓘ |
| dateSigned | 2009-10-28 ⓘ |
| effectiveDate | 2009-10-28 ⓘ |
| enactedBy | 111th United States Congress ⓘ |
| extendsProtectionTo |
victims targeted because of color
ⓘ
victims targeted because of disability ⓘ victims targeted because of gender ⓘ victims targeted because of gender identity ⓘ victims targeted because of national origin ⓘ victims targeted because of race ⓘ victims targeted because of religion ⓘ victims targeted because of sexual orientation ⓘ |
| includes | penalty enhancements for hate crime offenses ⓘ |
| introducedIn |
United States House of Representatives
ⓘ
United States Senate ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal and, in some cases, concurrent with state authorities ⓘ |
| legalBasis |
Commerce Clause
ⓘ
surface form:
Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution
|
| namedAfter |
James Byrd Jr.
ⓘ
Matthew Shepard ⓘ |
| partOf |
National Defense Authorization Acts
ⓘ
surface form:
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
|
| prohibits | willfully causing bodily injury because of a protected characteristic ⓘ |
| provides |
federal assistance in the investigation and prosecution of hate crimes
ⓘ
federal grants to state and local law enforcement for hate crime investigations ⓘ |
| purpose | to expand federal hate crime protections ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
18 U.S.C. § 245
ⓘ
Civil Rights Act of 1964 ⓘ
surface form:
Civil Rights Act of 1968
|
| removesRequirement | that the victim be engaged in a federally protected activity ⓘ |
| scope | applies to conduct affecting interstate or foreign commerce ⓘ |
| shortName | Shepard–Byrd Act ⓘ |
| signedBy | Barack Obama ⓘ |
| strengthens | federal enforcement of hate crime laws ⓘ |
| subjectMatter | bias-motivated violence ⓘ |
| titleOfPublicLaw | Public Law 111-84, Division E ⓘ |
| yearIntroduced | 2009 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act Description of subject: The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act is a U.S. federal law that expands hate crime protections to include crimes motivated by a victim’s actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability and strengthens federal enforcement of such offenses.
Referenced by (11)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.