Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case

E181546

The Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case was an 1870s U.S. Supreme Court legal challenge in which suffragist Virginia Minor argued that the 14th Amendment guaranteed women the right to vote, a claim the Court ultimately rejected.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case canonical 1

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
voting rights case
women’s suffrage case
alsoKnownAs Minor v. Happersett
surface form: Minor v. Happersett women’s suffrage case
argument that citizenship includes the privilege of voting
that women are citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment
associatedWith National Woman Suffrage Association
Susan B. Anthony’s New Departure strategy
chronologicallyBefore Nineteenth Amendment ratification in 1920
country United States of America
decisionDate 1875
decisionType unanimous decision
defendant Reese Happersett
endTime 1875
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States
hasLegalCitation Minor v. Happersett
hasLowerCourt Missouri judiciary
surface form: Missouri state courts
hasMainParty Husband of Virginia Minor
Reese Happersett
Virginia Minor
historicalContext Reconstruction era
holding states may restrict suffrage to men
the Constitution does not confer the right of suffrage upon anyone
the Fourteenth Amendment does not guarantee women the right to vote
impact highlighted need for a separate women’s suffrage amendment
slowed constitutional arguments for women’s suffrage based on the Fourteenth Amendment
involvesRight citizenship rights
right to vote
legalCitation 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162
legalDoctrine narrow interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause
legalIssue interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
status of women as citizens and voters
whether the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees women the right to vote
location Missouri
movementContext U.S. women’s suffrage movement
opinionBy Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite
surface form: Chief Justice Morrison Waite
outcome claim rejected
judgment for defendant
plaintiff Virginia Minor
plaintiffCitizenshipStatus U.S. citizen
plaintiffGender female
plaintiffRole suffragist
precedentFor state power to define voter qualifications
relatedTo Fourteenth Amendment
surface form: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Privileges and Immunities Clause
surface form: Privileges or Immunities Clause
startTime 1872
subjectOf scholarship on constitutional development and women’s rights

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Old Courthouse significantEvent Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case
subject surface form: Old Courthouse (St. Louis)