completeness theorem for first-order logic
E100620
The completeness theorem for first-order logic is a fundamental result in mathematical logic, proved by Kurt Gödel, which states that every logically valid first-order formula is provable from the axioms of first-order logic.
All labels observed (3)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Gödel's completeness theorem | 2 |
| compactness theorem | 1 |
| completeness theorem for first-order logic canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T839945 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: completeness theorem for first-order logic Context triple: [Kurt Gödel, notableWork, completeness theorem for first-order logic]
-
A.
Tarski's undefinability theorem
Tarski's undefinability theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic showing that, in sufficiently strong formal systems, the notion of truth for the language of the system cannot be defined within that same language.
-
B.
Gödel's incompleteness theorems
Gödel's incompleteness theorems are two fundamental results in mathematical logic showing that any sufficiently powerful, consistent formal system cannot prove all true statements about arithmetic, and cannot prove its own consistency.
-
C.
Hilbert’s program
Hilbert’s program was an influential early-20th-century initiative in the foundations of mathematics that sought to formalize all of mathematics and prove its consistency using finitistic methods.
-
D.
Kripke fixed-point theory of truth
The Kripke fixed-point theory of truth is a semantic framework developed by Saul Kripke that uses partial truth predicates and fixed points to consistently handle self-referential sentences and semantic paradoxes like the liar paradox.
-
E.
Lectures on the Logic of Arithmetic
Lectures on the Logic of Arithmetic is an educational work by Mary Everest Boole that explores the foundations and teaching of arithmetic through logical and psychological principles.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: completeness theorem for first-order logic Target entity description: The completeness theorem for first-order logic is a fundamental result in mathematical logic, proved by Kurt Gödel, which states that every logically valid first-order formula is provable from the axioms of first-order logic.
-
A.
Tarski's undefinability theorem
Tarski's undefinability theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic showing that, in sufficiently strong formal systems, the notion of truth for the language of the system cannot be defined within that same language.
-
B.
Gödel's incompleteness theorems
Gödel's incompleteness theorems are two fundamental results in mathematical logic showing that any sufficiently powerful, consistent formal system cannot prove all true statements about arithmetic, and cannot prove its own consistency.
-
C.
Hilbert’s program
Hilbert’s program was an influential early-20th-century initiative in the foundations of mathematics that sought to formalize all of mathematics and prove its consistency using finitistic methods.
-
D.
Kripke fixed-point theory of truth
The Kripke fixed-point theory of truth is a semantic framework developed by Saul Kripke that uses partial truth predicates and fixed points to consistently handle self-referential sentences and semantic paradoxes like the liar paradox.
-
E.
Lectures on the Logic of Arithmetic
Lectures on the Logic of Arithmetic is an educational work by Mary Everest Boole that explores the foundations and teaching of arithmetic through logical and psychological principles.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
mathematical theorem
ⓘ
metalogical theorem ⓘ result in mathematical logic ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs |
completeness theorem for first-order logic
ⓘ
surface form:
Gödel's completeness theorem
|
| appliesTo |
classical first-order logic
ⓘ
first-order logic ⓘ |
| assumes | standard Tarskian semantics for first-order logic ⓘ |
| author | Kurt Gödel ⓘ |
| clarifies | limits of first-order formalization ⓘ |
| concerns | relationship between semantic consequence and syntactic provability ⓘ |
| contrastsWith |
Gödel's incompleteness theorems
ⓘ
surface form:
incompleteness theorems
|
| dependsOn | soundness of the deductive system ⓘ |
| doesNotApplyTo | full second-order logic ⓘ |
| equivalentlyStates |
if a formula is not provable then there exists a model in which the formula is false
ⓘ
semantic consequence coincides with syntactic derivability for first-order logic ⓘ |
| field |
mathematical logic
ⓘ
model theory ⓘ proof theory ⓘ |
| historicalContext |
Hilbert’s program
ⓘ
surface form:
Hilbert program
|
| implies |
Löwenheim–Skolem theorem (via additional arguments)
ⓘ
compactness theorem for first-order logic ⓘ sound and complete proof systems exist for first-order logic ⓘ |
| influenced |
development of modern logic
ⓘ
formal semantics in logic ⓘ logical foundations of computer science ⓘ |
| isCornerstoneOf |
axiomatic method in mathematics
ⓘ
model theory ⓘ |
| laterProofMethod |
Henkin construction
ⓘ
canonical model construction ⓘ sequent calculus proofs ⓘ tableau methods ⓘ |
| originalProofMethod | reduction to Skolem normal form and construction of a countable model ⓘ |
| presentedAt | Königsberg conference 1930 ⓘ |
| relatesConcept |
deductive systems
ⓘ
logical validity ⓘ models ⓘ provability ⓘ |
| requires | effective deductive calculus for first-order logic ⓘ |
| shows | all first-order validities are recursively enumerable ⓘ |
| states |
every logically valid first-order formula is provable from the axioms of first-order logic
ⓘ
if a formula is true in every model then it has a formal proof from the axioms and rules of first-order logic ⓘ |
| usedIn |
automated theorem proving
ⓘ
formal verification ⓘ foundations of mathematics ⓘ |
| yearProved | 1929 ⓘ |
| yearPublished | 1930 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: completeness theorem for first-order logic Description of subject: The completeness theorem for first-order logic is a fundamental result in mathematical logic, proved by Kurt Gödel, which states that every logically valid first-order formula is provable from the axioms of first-order logic.
Referenced by (4)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.