Gödel's incompleteness theorems
E71396
Gödel's incompleteness theorems are two fundamental results in mathematical logic showing that any sufficiently powerful, consistent formal system cannot prove all true statements about arithmetic, and cannot prove its own consistency.
Aliases (6)
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
mathematical theorem
→
metamathematical theorem → result in mathematical logic → |
| appliesTo |
Peano arithmetic
→
Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with Choice → effectively axiomatized theories → formal axiomatic systems → recursively axiomatizable theories → sufficiently strong theories of arithmetic → |
| assumes |
ω-consistency in Gödel's original proof of the first theorem
→
|
| author |
Kurt Gödel
→
|
| concerns |
provability in formal systems
→
truth in arithmetic → |
| field |
foundations of mathematics
→
mathematical logic → metamathematics → proof theory → |
| firstTheoremStates |
any consistent, effectively axiomatized theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic is incomplete
→
|
| hasPart |
Gödel's first incompleteness theorem
→
Gödel's second incompleteness theorem → |
| implies |
a sufficiently strong consistent theory cannot prove its own consistency
→
existence of true but unprovable statements → limitations of Hilbert's program → no complete and consistent extension of Peano arithmetic is recursively axiomatizable → |
| influenced |
philosophy of logic
→
philosophy of mathematics → proof theory → theory of computation → |
| laterGeneralizedBy |
results using only simple consistency instead of ω-consistency
→
|
| namedAfter |
Kurt Gödel
→
|
| originalLanguage |
German
→
|
| publishedIn |
Monatshefte für Mathematik
→
|
| relatedTo |
Church–Turing thesis
→
Gödel numbering → Hilbert's program → Löb's theorem → Peano arithmetic → Tarski's undefinability theorem → |
| requires |
ability to represent basic arithmetic
→
consistency of the formal system → effective axiomatization → |
| secondTheoremStates |
no consistent, effectively axiomatized theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic can prove its own consistency
→
|
| showsLimitationOf |
axiomatic method for arithmetic
→
formalism in mathematics → |
| status |
proven
→
|
| usesMethod |
arithmetization of syntax
→
diagonalization → self-referential sentences → |
| yearProved |
1931
→
|
Referenced by (14)
| Subject (surface form when different) | Predicate |
|---|---|
|
Berry paradox
("Gödel’s incompleteness theorems")
→
Church–Turing thesis ("Gödel’s incompleteness theorems") → Epimenides paradox ("Gödel incompleteness theorems") → On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem ("Gödel’s incompleteness theorems") → Tarski's undefinability theorem → liar paradox → |
relatedTo |
|
Gödel's incompleteness theorems
("Gödel's first incompleteness theorem")
→
Gödel's incompleteness theorems ("Gödel's second incompleteness theorem") → |
hasPart |
|
Kurt Gödel
→
Raymond Smullyan ("Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems") → |
notableWork |
|
Hilbert’s program
("Gödel’s incompleteness theorems")
→
|
challengedBy |
|
ZF
("Gödel incompleteness theorems")
→
|
isIncompletenessSubjectTo |
|
Kurt Gödel
("incompleteness theorems")
→
|
knownFor |
|
Gödel, Escher, Bach
→
|
subject |