liar paradox

E13608

The liar paradox is a classic self-referential logical puzzle arising from sentences that declare their own falsehood, leading to a contradiction about whether they are true or false.

Aliases (1)

Statements (50)
Predicate Object
instanceOf logical paradox
philosophical problem
self-referential paradox
semantic paradox
addressedBy Kripke fixed-point theory of truth
Tarskian object-language/metalanguage distinction
contextualist approaches to truth
deflationary theories of truth
hierarchical theories of truth
paraconsistent logics
three-valued logics
coreFeature self-reference
semantic circularity
truth-value contradiction
difficulty cannot be consistently assigned a classical truth value
field mathematical logic
philosophy of language
philosophy of logic
hasFormulation I am lying.
This sentence is false.
hasVariant Yablo's paradox
revenge liar paradoxes
strengthened liar paradox
historicalAttribution Epimenides of Crete
Eubulides of Miletus
involvesConcept bivalence
falsity
self-reference in language
semantic closure
truth
leadsTo apparent inconsistency in naive truth theory
violation of classical bivalent semantics
logicalForm sentence that asserts its own falsity
motivates formal theories of truth
non-classical logics
restrictions on self-reference
problemStatement If the liar sentence is true, then it is false; if it is false, then it is true.
relatedTo Berry paradox
Curry paradox
Epimenides paradox
Grelling–Nelson paradox
Gödel's incompleteness theorems
Russell's paradox
Tarski's undefinability theorem
statusInLogic central test case for theories of truth and meaning
studiedBy Alfred Tarski
Graham Priest
Kurt Gödel
Saul Kripke
Stephen Yablo


Please wait…