Triple
T3390170
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gödel's incompleteness theorems |
E71396
|
entity |
| Predicate | secondTheoremStates |
P38252
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no consistent, effectively axiomatized theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic can prove its own consistency |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no consistent, effectively axiomatized theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic can prove its own consistency | Statement: [Gödel's incompleteness theorems, secondTheoremStates, no consistent, effectively axiomatized theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic can prove its own consistency]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondTheoremStates Context triple: [Gödel's incompleteness theorems, secondTheoremStates, no consistent, effectively axiomatized theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic can prove its own consistency]
-
A.
hasTheorem
chosen
Indicates that one entity (typically a mathematical theory, field, or work) includes, establishes, or is associated with a particular theorem.
-
B.
secondedBy
Indicates that an initial proposal, motion, or action by one entity is formally supported or endorsed by another entity as a second.
-
C.
secondClauseKnownAs
Indicates that one clause in a legal or formal document is alternatively referred to or identified by a second, specific name or designation.
-
D.
secondaryTo
Indicates that one condition, event, or factor occurs as a consequence of, or is caused by, another primary condition, event, or factor.
-
E.
secondScience
Indicates that the subject is the second entity in a sequence or ranking specifically within a scientific context or domain.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85a9c4a88190a854019341cb3b60 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb6682c708190b76a7a16cee7c5aa |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adadf705608190975423779430cc58 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:14 p.m.