Löwenheim–Skolem theorem (via additional arguments)
E446857
apparent paradox in set theory
result in model theory
theorem in mathematical logic
theorem in model theory
The Löwenheim–Skolem theorem is a fundamental result in model theory stating that any first-order theory with an infinite model has models of all infinite cardinalities, leading to the so-called Skolem paradox about the existence of countable models of set theory.
Observed surface forms (7)
| Surface form | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Löwenheim–Skolem theorem | 2 |
| Skolem paradox | 0 |
| downward Löwenheim–Skolem theorem | 1 |
| Skolem's paradox | 2 |
| upward Löwenheim–Skolem theorem | 0 |
| Skolem hull | 1 |
| Skolem paradox about countable models of set theory | 1 |
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
apparent paradox in set theory
ⓘ
result in model theory ⓘ theorem in mathematical logic ⓘ theorem in model theory ⓘ theorem in model theory ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
any first-order theory with an infinite model
ⓘ
first-order Peano arithmetic ⓘ first-order Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory NERFINISHED ⓘ first-order theories of fields ⓘ |
| assumes | standard semantics for first-order logic ⓘ |
| cardinalityCondition |
for uncountable languages, yields models of cardinalities bounded in terms of the language size
ⓘ
requires the language to be at most countable for the classical downward version ⓘ |
| concerns |
existence of countable models of set theory that talk about uncountable sets
ⓘ
first-order logic ⓘ first-order theories ⓘ models of theories ⓘ |
| doesNotApplyTo | second-order logic with full semantics ⓘ |
| field |
mathematical logic
ⓘ
model theory ⓘ |
| formalizes | existence of elementary submodels of smaller cardinality under certain conditions ⓘ |
| hasConsequence |
no first-order theory with an infinite model can control the cardinality of all its models
ⓘ
no infinite structure is categorical in all infinite cardinalities in first-order logic ⓘ |
| hasPart |
downward Löwenheim–Skolem theorem
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
upward Löwenheim–Skolem theorem NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| historicalDevelopment |
early form proved by Leopold Löwenheim in 1915
ⓘ
refined and simplified by Thoralf Skolem in the 1920s ⓘ |
| implies |
existence of countable models for theories with uncountable models
ⓘ
existence of models of all infinite cardinalities for certain theories ⓘ |
| influenced |
development of axiomatic set theory
ⓘ
philosophy of mathematics discussions about relativity of set-theoretic notions ⓘ |
| involves |
Skolem functions
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Skolem hulls NERFINISHED ⓘ elementary substructures ⓘ |
| namedAfter |
Leopold Löwenheim
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Thoralf Skolem NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Löwenheim–Skolem theorem
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Skolem paradox ⓘ compactness theorem NERFINISHED ⓘ completeness theorem for first-order logic ⓘ |
| requires | compactness of first-order logic for some proofs ⓘ |
| shows |
cardinality of a model of a first-order theory is not uniquely determined by the theory if it has an infinite model
ⓘ
first-order set theory has countable models if it has any infinite model ⓘ |
| states |
If a first-order theory has an infinite model then it has a countable model
ⓘ
If a first-order theory has an infinite model then it has models of arbitrarily large infinite cardinalities ⓘ |
| usedIn |
classification of models by cardinality
ⓘ
model-theoretic analysis of set theory ⓘ proofs of non-categoricity of many first-order theories in infinite cardinals ⓘ |
Referenced by (8)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
completeness theorem for first-order logic
→
implies
→
Löwenheim–Skolem theorem (via additional arguments)
ⓘ
this entity surface form:
Skolem's paradox
this entity surface form:
Löwenheim–Skolem theorem
this entity surface form:
Skolem hull
this entity surface form:
Skolem's paradox
this entity surface form:
Löwenheim–Skolem theorem
this entity surface form:
downward Löwenheim–Skolem theorem
this entity surface form:
Skolem paradox about countable models of set theory