Triple
T4492883
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | completeness theorem for first-order logic |
E100620
|
entity |
| Predicate | implies |
P1661
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Löwenheim–Skolem theorem (via additional arguments)
The Löwenheim–Skolem theorem is a fundamental result in model theory stating that any first-order theory with an infinite model has models of all infinite cardinalities, leading to the so-called Skolem paradox about the existence of countable models of set theory.
|
E446857
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem (via additional arguments) | Statement: [completeness theorem for first-order logic, implies, Löwenheim–Skolem theorem (via additional arguments)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem (via additional arguments) Context triple: [completeness theorem for first-order logic, implies, Löwenheim–Skolem theorem (via additional arguments)]
-
A.
Tarski–Mostowski–Robinson theorem
The Tarski–Mostowski–Robinson theorem is a fundamental result in model theory that characterizes when a class of structures is first-order axiomatizable, linking definability properties with closure under ultraproducts and isomorphisms.
-
B.
Tarski's undefinability theorem
Tarski's undefinability theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic showing that, in sufficiently strong formal systems, the notion of truth for the language of the system cannot be defined within that same language.
-
C.
Hamilton’s compactness theorem
Hamilton’s compactness theorem is a fundamental result in geometric analysis that provides conditions under which a sequence of Riemannian manifolds with controlled curvature and injectivity radius admits a smoothly convergent subsequence.
-
D.
Cantor’s theorem
Cantor’s theorem is a fundamental result in set theory stating that the power set of any set has a strictly greater cardinality than the set itself, implying there is no largest infinity.
-
E.
completeness theorem for first-order logic
The completeness theorem for first-order logic is a fundamental result in mathematical logic, proved by Kurt Gödel, which states that every logically valid first-order formula is provable from the axioms of first-order logic.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem (via additional arguments) Triple: [completeness theorem for first-order logic, implies, Löwenheim–Skolem theorem (via additional arguments)]
Generated description
The Löwenheim–Skolem theorem is a fundamental result in model theory stating that any first-order theory with an infinite model has models of all infinite cardinalities, leading to the so-called Skolem paradox about the existence of countable models of set theory.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Löwenheim–Skolem theorem (via additional arguments) Target entity description: The Löwenheim–Skolem theorem is a fundamental result in model theory stating that any first-order theory with an infinite model has models of all infinite cardinalities, leading to the so-called Skolem paradox about the existence of countable models of set theory.
-
A.
Tarski–Mostowski–Robinson theorem
The Tarski–Mostowski–Robinson theorem is a fundamental result in model theory that characterizes when a class of structures is first-order axiomatizable, linking definability properties with closure under ultraproducts and isomorphisms.
-
B.
Tarski's undefinability theorem
Tarski's undefinability theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic showing that, in sufficiently strong formal systems, the notion of truth for the language of the system cannot be defined within that same language.
-
C.
Hamilton’s compactness theorem
Hamilton’s compactness theorem is a fundamental result in geometric analysis that provides conditions under which a sequence of Riemannian manifolds with controlled curvature and injectivity radius admits a smoothly convergent subsequence.
-
D.
Cantor’s theorem
Cantor’s theorem is a fundamental result in set theory stating that the power set of any set has a strictly greater cardinality than the set itself, implying there is no largest infinity.
-
E.
completeness theorem for first-order logic
The completeness theorem for first-order logic is a fundamental result in mathematical logic, proved by Kurt Gödel, which states that every logically valid first-order formula is provable from the axioms of first-order logic.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43cdf15081909a4fa2585ff63b3e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5570ba0881908f5fb4f8d0730e64 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bd67b40fd4819098636b6f29304312 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:28 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69bd688e84fc8190a8900be40e3cf694 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69bd69bcf10c8190bd6ceb6bc604b3f5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 12:59 p.m.