legalDoctrine
P4756
predicate
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
All labels observed (43)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| legalDoctrine canonical | 138 |
| legalStandard | 44 |
| associatedWithLegalDoctrine | 27 |
| legalPrincipleEstablished | 25 |
| relatedLegalDoctrine | 20 |
| ruleOfLaw | 20 |
| legalMethodology | 18 |
| associatedLegalDoctrine | 17 |
| legalRuling | 15 |
| associatedLegalPrinciple | 12 |
| lawApplied | 12 |
| legalDoctrineAssociatedWith | 10 |
| legalDoctrineEstablished | 7 |
| legalPrincipleApplied | 7 |
| legalFormulation | 5 |
| legalDoctrineApplied | 4 |
| legalDoctrineAssociated | 4 |
| legalDoctrineInvolved | 4 |
| relatedLegalPrinciple | 4 |
| involvesLegalDoctrine | 3 |
| legalDoctrineAdvanced | 3 |
| juridicalMethod | 2 |
| legalArgumentBasis | 2 |
| legalDoctrineArticulated | 2 |
| legalDoctrineDiscussed | 2 |
| legalPrincipleAtIssue | 2 |
| legalPrincipleType | 2 |
| legalTestRestored | 2 |
| implicatedLegalDoctrine | 1 |
| juridicalOrientation | 1 |
| juridicalPrinciple | 1 |
| legalDoctrineEstablishedInCase | 1 |
| legalDoctrineExtended | 1 |
| legalDoctrineInvoked | 1 |
| legalDoctrineUsed | 1 |
| legalPrincipleAffirmed | 1 |
| legalPrincipleAffirmedByCourt | 1 |
| legalPrincipleAssociated | 1 |
| legalPrincipleAssociatedWith | 1 |
| legalPrincipleUsed | 1 |
| legalTheoryUsed | 1 |
| testInModernLaw | 1 |
| usesLegalDoctrine | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: legalDoctrine
Generated description
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
Sample triples (428)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Kimberly Ellerth | employer vicarious liability for supervisor harassment via predicate surface "legalDoctrineAssociated" ⓘ |
| Kimberly Ellerth | affirmative defense based on reasonable care to prevent and correct harassment via predicate surface "legalDoctrineAssociated" ⓘ |
| Kimberly Ellerth | employee duty to use employer complaint procedures via predicate surface "legalDoctrineAssociated" ⓘ |
| United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. | command responsibility via predicate surface "legalDoctrineDiscussed" ⓘ |
| United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. | superior responsibility for subordinates via predicate surface "legalDoctrineDiscussed" ⓘ |
| federal Anti-Kickback Statute | knowingly and willfully via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| Lord Diplock | tripartite classification of judicial review grounds ⓘ |
| Lord Diplock | illegality as a ground of judicial review ⓘ |
| Lord Diplock | irrationality as a ground of judicial review ⓘ |
| Lord Diplock | procedural impropriety as a ground of judicial review ⓘ |
| Lakhdar Boumediene | constitutional habeas corpus applies to non-citizens held at Guantánamo Bay via predicate surface "legalPrincipleEstablished" ⓘ |
| Detective Division (Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department) | California state law via predicate surface "lawApplied" ⓘ |
| Detective Division (Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department) | Los Angeles County ordinances via predicate surface "lawApplied" ⓘ |
| Detective Division (Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department) | applicable federal law via predicate surface "lawApplied" ⓘ |
| Roosevelt Court | broad reading of the Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| Roosevelt Court | acceptance of federal economic planning measures ⓘ |
| Roosevelt Court | more expansive view of federal spending power ⓘ |
| Roosevelt Court | shift away from strict limits on federal regulatory authority ⓘ |
| Crown in Montgomeryshire | The Crown via predicate surface "legalFormulation" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Brown v. Illinois | The giving of Miranda warnings is an important factor but not dispositive in determining attenuation from an unlawful arrest. via predicate surface "ruleOfLaw" ⓘ |
| Brown v. Illinois | Courts must consider temporal proximity, intervening circumstances, and the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct in assessing attenuation. via predicate surface "ruleOfLaw" ⓘ |
| Hunter v. Erickson, 393 U.S. 385 (1969) | political process doctrine ⓘ |
| Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1, 458 U.S. 457 (1982) | political process doctrine ⓘ |
|
Treaty of Madrid
surface form:
Treaty of Madrid (1750)
|
uti possidetis via predicate surface "legalPrincipleUsed" ⓘ |
| David Leroy Washington | two-prong test for ineffective assistance of counsel via predicate surface "legalDoctrineEstablishedInCase" ⓘ |
| Barker balancing test | constitutional reasonableness via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| Michael Crawford | testimonial hearsay via predicate surface "relatedLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Michael Crawford | right to confront witnesses via predicate surface "relatedLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Michael Crawford | admissibility of hearsay evidence via predicate surface "relatedLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Ohio v. Roberts | Hearsay is admissible under the Confrontation Clause if it falls within a firmly rooted hearsay exception or bears particularized guarantees of trustworthiness. via predicate surface "ruleOfLaw" ⓘ |
| Ohio v. Roberts | indicia of reliability test ⓘ |
| United States v. Henry | Once the Sixth Amendment right to counsel has attached, the government may not deliberately elicit incriminating statements from the defendant in the absence of counsel. via predicate surface "ruleOfLaw" ⓘ |
| Ohio v. Clark | Statements are testimonial when their primary purpose is to create an out-of-court substitute for trial testimony. via predicate surface "ruleOfLaw" ⓘ |
| Ohio v. Clark | Statements to individuals who are not law enforcement officers are less likely to be testimonial. via predicate surface "ruleOfLaw" ⓘ |
| Ohio v. Clark | Mandatory reporting duties of teachers do not by themselves transform conversations with students into law-enforcement interrogations. via predicate surface "ruleOfLaw" ⓘ |
| Tucker | good-faith reliance on then-valid interrogation standards via predicate surface "associatedWithLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Tucker | limits on the fruits-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine for Miranda violations via predicate surface "associatedWithLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 | knowledge that property represents proceeds of unlawful activity via predicate surface "legalStandard" ⓘ |
| William M’Intosh | doctrine of discovery via predicate surface "associatedLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| William M’Intosh | aboriginal title via predicate surface "associatedLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| William M’Intosh | federal supremacy over Indian land transactions via predicate surface "associatedLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Bagosora failed to prevent or punish crimes committed by forces under his authority | command responsibility ⓘ |
| Bagosora failed to prevent or punish crimes committed by forces under his authority | superior responsibility ⓘ |
| Boz-Kourt | Lotus principle via predicate surface "relatedLegalPrinciple" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| South Carolina Exposition and Protest | compact theory of the Constitution via predicate surface "legalTheoryUsed" ⓘ |
| Irene Emerson | doctrine that African Americans could not be U.S. citizens (as articulated in Dred Scott v. Sandford) via predicate surface "associatedWithLegalDoctrine" ⓘ |
| Al-Aswad ibn Yazid | reliance on teachings of Abd Allah ibn Mas'ud via predicate surface "legalMethodology" ⓘ |
| Waite Court | narrow interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause ⓘ |
| Waite Court | recognition of broad state police power over businesses affected with a public interest ⓘ |
| Waite Court | early foundations of corporate personhood under the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |