Tucker
E826430
Tucker is the criminal defendant whose custodial interrogation and subsequent appeal led to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Michigan v. Tucker, which clarified the scope of Miranda-related protections.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Tucker canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T9830634 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tucker Context triple: [Michigan v. Tucker, hasRespondent, Tucker]
-
A.
Tucker
Tucker is a surname most notably associated with Albert W. Tucker, a Canadian-American mathematician and game theorist known for his contributions to topology and the formalization of the prisoner's dilemma.
-
B.
Tucker
Tucker is a paranormal investigator character from the Insidious horror film series, known for his tech-based ghost-hunting work alongside his partner Specs.
-
C.
Parker
Parker is a common English surname borne by numerous notable individuals across fields such as politics, sports, arts, and science.
-
D.
Parker
Parker is a 2013 American crime thriller film starring Jason Statham as a professional thief who seeks revenge after being double-crossed by his crew.
-
E.
Junior Tucker
Junior Tucker is a Jamaican reggae and gospel singer known for his smooth vocals and early success as a child star in the 1970s.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tucker Target entity description: Tucker is the criminal defendant whose custodial interrogation and subsequent appeal led to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Michigan v. Tucker, which clarified the scope of Miranda-related protections.
-
A.
Tucker
Tucker is a surname most notably associated with Albert W. Tucker, a Canadian-American mathematician and game theorist known for his contributions to topology and the formalization of the prisoner's dilemma.
-
B.
Tucker
Tucker is a paranormal investigator character from the Insidious horror film series, known for his tech-based ghost-hunting work alongside his partner Specs.
-
C.
Parker
Parker is a common English surname borne by numerous notable individuals across fields such as politics, sports, arts, and science.
-
D.
Parker
Parker is a 2013 American crime thriller film starring Jason Statham as a professional thief who seeks revenge after being double-crossed by his crew.
-
E.
Junior Tucker
Junior Tucker is a Jamaican reggae and gospel singer known for his smooth vocals and early success as a child star in the 1970s.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (28)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
criminal defendant
ⓘ
person ⓘ |
| appealedTo | Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| associatedWithLegalDoctrine |
good-faith reliance on then-valid interrogation standards
ⓘ
limits on the fruits-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine for Miranda violations ⓘ |
| caseCharacterizedAs | Miranda progeny case ⓘ |
| caseCitation | 417 U.S. 433 ⓘ |
| caseClarified |
scope of Miranda-related protections
ⓘ
use of derivative evidence obtained after incomplete Miranda warnings ⓘ |
| caseDecisionYear | 1974 ⓘ |
| caseHeldThat | failure to give full Miranda warnings did not require exclusion of testimony of a witness discovered through the defendant’s unwarned but voluntary statements ⓘ |
| caseOriginatedFrom | Michigan state criminal prosecution ⓘ |
| constitutionalAmendmentImplicated |
Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| constitutionalIssueInCase |
Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
ⓘ
Miranda warnings NERFINISHED ⓘ exclusionary rule ⓘ |
| jurisdictionOfCase | State of Michigan NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalStatusInCase | criminal defendant in Michigan v. Tucker ⓘ |
| nameAppearsIn | Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433 (1974) NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| partyToCase | Michigan v. Tucker NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| rightsImplicated |
Miranda right to warnings before custodial interrogation
ⓘ
right against compelled self-incrimination ⓘ |
| roleIn | Michigan v. Tucker NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| timePeriodOfCase | 1970s ⓘ |
| wasQuestionedBefore | full Miranda warnings were required to be applied retroactively ⓘ |
| wasSubjectOf |
custodial interrogation
ⓘ
police interrogation ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Tucker Description of subject: Tucker is the criminal defendant whose custodial interrogation and subsequent appeal led to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Michigan v. Tucker, which clarified the scope of Miranda-related protections.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.