Tucker

E826430

Tucker is the criminal defendant whose custodial interrogation and subsequent appeal led to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Michigan v. Tucker, which clarified the scope of Miranda-related protections.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (28)

Predicate Object
instanceOf criminal defendant
person
appealedTo Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED
associatedWithLegalDoctrine good-faith reliance on then-valid interrogation standards
limits on the fruits-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine for Miranda violations
caseCharacterizedAs Miranda progeny case
caseCitation 417 U.S. 433
caseClarified scope of Miranda-related protections
use of derivative evidence obtained after incomplete Miranda warnings
caseDecisionYear 1974
caseHeldThat failure to give full Miranda warnings did not require exclusion of testimony of a witness discovered through the defendant’s unwarned but voluntary statements
caseOriginatedFrom Michigan state criminal prosecution
constitutionalAmendmentImplicated Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
constitutionalIssueInCase Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
Miranda warnings NERFINISHED
exclusionary rule
jurisdictionOfCase State of Michigan NERFINISHED
legalStatusInCase criminal defendant in Michigan v. Tucker
nameAppearsIn Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433 (1974) NERFINISHED
partyToCase Michigan v. Tucker NERFINISHED
rightsImplicated Miranda right to warnings before custodial interrogation
right against compelled self-incrimination
roleIn Michigan v. Tucker NERFINISHED
timePeriodOfCase 1970s
wasQuestionedBefore full Miranda warnings were required to be applied retroactively
wasSubjectOf custodial interrogation
police interrogation

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.