United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al.
E701493
United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal held in Nuremberg that prosecuted German officers for war crimes committed in the Balkans, particularly involving hostage-taking and reprisals against civilians.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. canonical | 1 |
| United States of America vs. Wilhelm von Leeb, et al. | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T7874588 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. Context triple: [Hostages Trial, hasAlternativeName, United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al.]
-
A.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg military tribunal case prosecuting Nazi physicians and officials for war crimes and crimes against humanity arising from inhumane medical experiments and the euthanasia program.
-
B.
United States of America vs. Erhard Milch
United States of America vs. Erhard Milch was a post–World War II Nuremberg war crimes trial in which former Luftwaffe Field Marshal Erhard Milch was prosecuted for his role in the Nazi regime’s use of forced labor and other atrocities.
-
C.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
D.
U.S. Nuremberg Military Tribunal I
U.S. Nuremberg Military Tribunal I was the first American-run post–World War II military court at Nuremberg, best known for prosecuting Nazi physicians and officials for war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Doctors' Trial.
-
E.
United States v. Sokolow
United States v. Sokolow is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the standard for reasonable suspicion under the Fourth Amendment, particularly in the context of drug courier profiling and investigative stops.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. Target entity description: United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal held in Nuremberg that prosecuted German officers for war crimes committed in the Balkans, particularly involving hostage-taking and reprisals against civilians.
-
A.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg military tribunal case prosecuting Nazi physicians and officials for war crimes and crimes against humanity arising from inhumane medical experiments and the euthanasia program.
-
B.
United States of America vs. Erhard Milch
United States of America vs. Erhard Milch was a post–World War II Nuremberg war crimes trial in which former Luftwaffe Field Marshal Erhard Milch was prosecuted for his role in the Nazi regime’s use of forced labor and other atrocities.
-
C.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
D.
U.S. Nuremberg Military Tribunal I
U.S. Nuremberg Military Tribunal I was the first American-run post–World War II military court at Nuremberg, best known for prosecuting Nazi physicians and officials for war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Doctors' Trial.
-
E.
United States v. Sokolow
United States v. Sokolow is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the standard for reasonable suspicion under the Fourth Amendment, particularly in the context of drug courier profiling and investigative stops.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
U.S. military tribunal
ⓘ
post–World War II military proceeding ⓘ war crimes trial ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs |
Hostages Trial
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
The Hostages Case NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| charge |
crimes against humanity
ⓘ
war crimes ⓘ |
| country | United States of America ⓘ |
| court | U.S. Military Tribunal V NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| defendant |
Ernst Dehner
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Ernst von Leyser NERFINISHED ⓘ Franz Böhme NERFINISHED ⓘ Friedrich Felmy NERFINISHED ⓘ Hermann Foertsch NERFINISHED ⓘ Hermann Speidel NERFINISHED ⓘ Hubert Lanz NERFINISHED ⓘ Kurt von Krenzki NERFINISHED ⓘ Lothar Rendulic NERFINISHED ⓘ Maximilian von Weichs NERFINISHED ⓘ Walter Kuntze NERFINISHED ⓘ Wilhelm List NERFINISHED ⓘ Wilhelm von Geitner NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| endDate | 1948-02-19 ⓘ |
| focusRegion |
Albania
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Balkans NERFINISHED ⓘ Greece NERFINISHED ⓘ Norway NERFINISHED ⓘ Yugoslavia NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| historicalPeriod | post–World War II ⓘ |
| language |
English
ⓘ
German ⓘ |
| legalDoctrineDiscussed |
command responsibility
ⓘ
superior responsibility for subordinates ⓘ |
| legalStatus | completed case ⓘ |
| location |
American Zone of Occupation in Germany
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Nuremberg NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| mainAllegation |
illegal hostage-taking
ⓘ
murder of civilians in the Balkans ⓘ reprisals against civilians ⓘ |
| partOf | Subsequent Nuremberg Trials NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| presidingJudge | Charles F. Wennerstrum NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| prosecutor | Telford Taylor NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| result |
several acquittals
ⓘ
several convictions ⓘ |
| startDate | 1947-07-08 ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
German military occupation policies in the Balkans
ⓘ
hostage shootings as reprisals ⓘ treatment of partisans and civilians ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. Description of subject: United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal held in Nuremberg that prosecuted German officers for war crimes committed in the Balkans, particularly involving hostage-taking and reprisals against civilians.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
this entity surface form:
United States of America vs. Wilhelm von Leeb, et al.