Triple
T31828101
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Treaty of Madrid (1750) |
E812450
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalPrincipleUsed |
P4756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | uti possidetis |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: uti possidetis | Statement: [Treaty of Madrid (1750), legalPrincipleUsed, uti possidetis]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPrincipleUsed Context triple: [Treaty of Madrid (1750), legalPrincipleUsed, uti possidetis]
-
A.
hasLegalPrincipleInvoked
Indicates that a legal case, action, or decision relies on, cites, or is based upon a specific legal principle.
-
B.
legalBasis
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
C.
legalConcept
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
-
D.
legalDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
E.
legalBasisConsidered
Indicates that a decision, action, or assessment has taken into account the relevant legal grounds, statutes, or regulations as part of its justification.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348e97fa48190aa06286962af6dee |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe9fb9735c8190a360b556c9d00b3f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe9eaa88008190a9b2a469dc685002 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:47 p.m.