reasoningIncludes
P25044
predicate
Indicates that a reasoning process or argument explicitly incorporates or makes use of the referenced element as one of its components or steps.
All labels observed (8)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| reasoningIncludes canonical | 17 |
| reasoningBasedOn | 6 |
| supportsReasoningOver | 2 |
| typicalReasoningProcedure | 2 |
| usesReasoningPattern | 2 |
| isPartOfReasoningIn | 1 |
| reasoningInvolves | 1 |
| reasoningStandard | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: reasoningIncludes
Generated description
Indicates that a reasoning process or argument explicitly incorporates or makes use of the referenced element as one of its components or steps.
Sample triples (32)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause | finding that substantial portions of motel clientele were interstate travelers ⓘ |
| Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause | conclusion that racial discrimination discourages interstate travel ⓘ |
| Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause | deference to congressional findings on the impact of discrimination on commerce ⓘ |
| RDFS | class hierarchies via predicate surface "supportsReasoningOver" ⓘ |
| RDFS | property hierarchies via predicate surface "supportsReasoningOver" ⓘ |
| Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers |
Katzenbach v. McClung
via predicate surface "isPartOfReasoningIn"
ⓘ
surface form:
Supreme Court’s analysis in Katzenbach v. McClung
|
| United States v. Leon | the exclusionary rule is a judicially created remedy, not a personal constitutional right ⓘ |
| United States v. Leon | the costs of exclusion may outweigh its deterrent benefits when officers act in objective good faith ⓘ |
| Description Logic | tableau-based algorithms via predicate surface "typicalReasoningProcedure" ⓘ |
| Description Logic | automated theorem proving via predicate surface "typicalReasoningProcedure" ⓘ |
| Michigan v. Tucker | Miranda safeguards are not themselves constitutional rights but measures to protect the Fifth Amendment ⓘ |
| Michigan v. Tucker | not all Miranda violations require exclusion of all fruits of the statement ⓘ |
| Pollard v. Hagan | historical understanding of sovereignty at the American Revolution via predicate surface "reasoningBasedOn" ⓘ |
| Pollard v. Hagan | principle that new states enter the Union on an equal footing with original states via predicate surface "reasoningBasedOn" ⓘ |
| Erie doctrine | concern about forum shopping ⓘ |
| Erie doctrine | concern about inequitable administration of the laws ⓘ |
| Sorites paradox | inductive step from small change via predicate surface "usesReasoningPattern" ⓘ |
| Sorites paradox | sorites series via predicate surface "usesReasoningPattern" ⓘ |
| Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause | rational basis review via predicate surface "reasoningStandard" ⓘ |
| Payton v. New York | physical entry of the home is the chief evil against which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed ⓘ |
| Payton v. New York | warrantless home entries for routine arrests are presumptively unreasonable ⓘ |
| Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional | protection of expressive conduct as free speech via predicate surface "reasoningInvolves" ⓘ |
| Green v. Biddle | compact between Virginia and the United States regarding Kentucky lands via predicate surface "reasoningBasedOn" ⓘ |
|
The Ninth Circuit held that the school violated Frederick's First Amendment rights.
surface form:
The Ninth Circuit held that the school violated Frederick's First Amendment rights
|
school officials may not punish student speech absent a showing of substantial disruption or invasion of the rights of others ⓘ |
|
The Ninth Circuit held that the school violated Frederick's First Amendment rights.
surface form:
The Ninth Circuit held that the school violated Frederick's First Amendment rights
|
Frederick's banner did not cause substantial disruption ⓘ |
|
The Ninth Circuit held that the school violated Frederick's First Amendment rights.
surface form:
The Ninth Circuit held that the school violated Frederick's First Amendment rights
|
Frederick's banner did not advocate illegal drug use in a way that justified suppression ⓘ |
| Muller v. Oregon | women’s physical differences from men ⓘ |
| Muller v. Oregon | state interest in protecting women’s health ⓘ |
| Muller v. Oregon | role of women as mothers ⓘ |
|
Snake Island had limited effect on maritime delimitation
surface form:
"Snake Island had limited effect on maritime delimitation"
|
avoidance of cut-off effects via predicate surface "reasoningBasedOn" ⓘ |
|
Snake Island had limited effect on maritime delimitation
surface form:
"Snake Island had limited effect on maritime delimitation"
|
proportionality between coastlines and maritime areas via predicate surface "reasoningBasedOn" ⓘ |
|
Snake Island had limited effect on maritime delimitation
surface form:
"Snake Island had limited effect on maritime delimitation"
|
equidistance/relevant circumstances method via predicate surface "reasoningBasedOn" ⓘ |