Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional

E642287

"Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional" refers to the U.S. Supreme Court’s determination that a federal law criminalizing flag desecration violated the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (25)

Predicate Object
instanceOf constitutional law principle
legal holding
affects federal criminal prohibition on flag desecration
announcedInCase United States v. Eichman NERFINISHED
United States v. Haggerty NERFINISHED
appliesToLaw Flag Protection Act of 1989 NERFINISHED
clarifies that symbolic flag burning can be protected speech
constitutionalProvisionInvoked Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment NERFINISHED
constrains Congress’s power to criminalize expressive conduct involving the U.S. flag
determinedByCourt Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED
effect invalidated federal prosecutions under the Flag Protection Act of 1989
historicalContext post-Texas v. Johnson congressional response
holdsThat government may not prohibit expression simply because society finds it offensive or disagreeable
jurisdiction United States federal law NERFINISHED
legalBasis First Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
reasoningInvolves protection of expressive conduct as free speech
refersTo the U.S. Supreme Court’s determination that the Flag Protection Act of 1989 violated the First Amendment
relatedTo Texas v. Johnson NERFINISHED
status binding precedent in U.S. constitutional law
supportsPrinciple strict scrutiny for content-based speech regulations
viewpoint neutrality in First Amendment law
topic content-based restrictions on speech
flag desecration
symbolic speech
yearOfDecision 1990

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

United States v. Eichman held Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional