Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional
E642287
"Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional" refers to the U.S. Supreme Court’s determination that a federal law criminalizing flag desecration violated the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T7093553 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional Context triple: [United States v. Eichman, held, Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional]
-
A.
Law Regarding the National Flag and National Anthem
The Law Regarding the National Flag and National Anthem is a Japanese statute enacted in 1999 that formally designates the Hinomaru as Japan’s national flag and “Kimigayo” as its national anthem.
-
B.
United States Flag Code
The United States Flag Code is the federal guideline that prescribes proper display, use, and respect for the American flag.
-
C.
City of Boerne v. Flores
City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
-
D.
Town of Greece v. Galloway
Town of Greece v. Galloway is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of opening town meetings with predominantly Christian prayers under the Establishment Clause.
-
E.
Van Orden v. Perry
Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional Target entity description: "Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional" refers to the U.S. Supreme Court’s determination that a federal law criminalizing flag desecration violated the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
A.
Law Regarding the National Flag and National Anthem
The Law Regarding the National Flag and National Anthem is a Japanese statute enacted in 1999 that formally designates the Hinomaru as Japan’s national flag and “Kimigayo” as its national anthem.
-
B.
United States Flag Code
The United States Flag Code is the federal guideline that prescribes proper display, use, and respect for the American flag.
-
C.
City of Boerne v. Flores
City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
-
D.
Town of Greece v. Galloway
Town of Greece v. Galloway is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of opening town meetings with predominantly Christian prayers under the Establishment Clause.
-
E.
Van Orden v. Perry
Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (25)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
constitutional law principle
ⓘ
legal holding ⓘ |
| affects | federal criminal prohibition on flag desecration ⓘ |
| announcedInCase |
United States v. Eichman
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
United States v. Haggerty NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| appliesToLaw | Flag Protection Act of 1989 NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| clarifies | that symbolic flag burning can be protected speech ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInvoked | Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| constrains | Congress’s power to criminalize expressive conduct involving the U.S. flag ⓘ |
| determinedByCourt | Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| effect | invalidated federal prosecutions under the Flag Protection Act of 1989 ⓘ |
| historicalContext | post-Texas v. Johnson congressional response ⓘ |
| holdsThat | government may not prohibit expression simply because society finds it offensive or disagreeable ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | United States federal law NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalBasis | First Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| reasoningInvolves | protection of expressive conduct as free speech ⓘ |
| refersTo | the U.S. Supreme Court’s determination that the Flag Protection Act of 1989 violated the First Amendment ⓘ |
| relatedTo | Texas v. Johnson NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| status | binding precedent in U.S. constitutional law ⓘ |
| supportsPrinciple |
strict scrutiny for content-based speech regulations
ⓘ
viewpoint neutrality in First Amendment law ⓘ |
| topic |
content-based restrictions on speech
ⓘ
flag desecration ⓘ symbolic speech ⓘ |
| yearOfDecision | 1990 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional Description of subject: "Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional" refers to the U.S. Supreme Court’s determination that a federal law criminalizing flag desecration violated the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.