Triple
T25620690
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional |
E642287
|
entity |
| Predicate | determinedByCourt |
P99073
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court of the United States |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court of the United States | Statement: [Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional, determinedByCourt, Supreme Court of the United States]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: determinedByCourt Context triple: [Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional, determinedByCourt, Supreme Court of the United States]
-
A.
decisionCourt
chosen
Indicates that a particular court rendered the decision or judgment in a given legal case or proceeding.
-
B.
overseenByCourt
Indicates that an action, process, or entity is subject to supervision, authority, or control by a court.
-
C.
determinedBy
Indicates that one entity’s state, value, or outcome is decided, controlled, or fully specified by another entity.
-
D.
caseDecidedBy
Indicates that a legal case is resolved or adjudicated by a specific decision-making authority, such as a judge or court.
-
E.
courtOrdered
Indicates that an action, condition, or relationship exists because it has been formally mandated or imposed by a court order.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7a96748190b10f2699041e4e43 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5fa204d1c8190b441d4efd8d80940 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4807f8680819098a524158d049c63 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 10:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:04 p.m.