Triple

T25620689
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional E642287 entity
Predicate reasoningInvolves P25044 FINISHED
Object protection of expressive conduct as free speech LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: protection of expressive conduct as free speech | Statement: [Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional, reasoningInvolves, protection of expressive conduct as free speech]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reasoningInvolves
Context triple: [Flag Protection Act of 1989 is unconstitutional, reasoningInvolves, protection of expressive conduct as free speech]
  • A. reasoningType
    Indicates the specific kind or mode of reasoning applied in deriving a conclusion or making an inference between entities.
  • B. reasoningIncludes chosen
    Indicates that a reasoning process or argument explicitly incorporates or makes use of the referenced element as one of its components or steps.
  • C. canReasonAbout
    Indicates that one entity has the capability to understand, analyze, or draw inferences about another entity or subject.
  • D. hasReasoningTask
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, assigned, or involved in a reasoning-related task or activity.
  • E. hasReasoningComplexity
    Indicates that an action, process, or decision involves a certain level or type of cognitive or logical complexity in its reasoning.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e77e7a96748190b10f2699041e4e43 completed April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6640168948190811bd5f933a87cf5 completed May 2, 2026, 8:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6633451948190bcc0410602bb4914 completed May 2, 2026, 8:48 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:04 p.m.