Triple

T16101810
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause E390637 entity
Predicate reasoningStandard P25044 FINISHED
Object rational basis review LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rational basis review | Statement: [Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause, reasoningStandard, rational basis review]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reasoningStandard
Context triple: [Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause, reasoningStandard, rational basis review]
  • A. statedReason
    Indicates that one entity expresses or provides another entity as the explanation, justification, or motive for an action, event, or claim.
  • B. reasoningIncludes chosen
    Indicates that a reasoning process or argument explicitly incorporates or makes use of the referenced element as one of its components or steps.
  • C. hasReasoningComplexity
    Indicates that an action, process, or decision involves a certain level or type of cognitive or logical complexity in its reasoning.
  • D. baseStandard
    Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational or reference standard upon which another entity is defined, measured, or evaluated.
  • E. standardWithin
    Indicates that one entity conforms to, or falls within the limits of, a specified standard defined by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f198bc48190a8b7e53ca15b7ead completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e1ff68686481909517eed4266729ca completed April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e182804208819087f35307cd6e4103 completed April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.