Triple
T15391458
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sorites paradox |
E368054
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesReasoningPattern |
P25044
|
FINISHED |
| Object | inductive step from small change |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: inductive step from small change | Statement: [Sorites paradox, usesReasoningPattern, inductive step from small change]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesReasoningPattern Context triple: [Sorites paradox, usesReasoningPattern, inductive step from small change]
-
A.
usesReasoningStyle
Indicates that one entity employs or adopts a particular style or method of reasoning in its thinking or decision-making processes.
-
B.
reasoningIncludes
chosen
Indicates that a reasoning process or argument explicitly incorporates or makes use of the referenced element as one of its components or steps.
-
C.
hasReasoningComplexity
Indicates that an action, process, or decision involves a certain level or type of cognitive or logical complexity in its reasoning.
-
D.
hasReasoningTask
Indicates that an entity is associated with, assigned, or involved in a reasoning-related task or activity.
-
E.
reasonForUse
Indicates that one entity specifies the justification, purpose, or motivation for using another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1551a08190ba2caea7cd51c639 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03e7727a081908eff45bbc1633c8a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ded27b8cac8190bfa77698d53c5d1c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:19 a.m.