H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.

E942130

H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the "pattern of racketeering activity" requirement under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf RICO case
United States Supreme Court case
areaOfLaw civil RICO
federal criminal law
citation 106 L. Ed. 2d 195
109 S. Ct. 2893
492 U.S. 229
clarifiedConcept pattern of racketeering activity under RICO
concurrenceBy Anthony M. Kennedy NERFINISHED
Antonin Scalia NERFINISHED
John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED
William H. Rehnquist NERFINISHED
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1989-06-26
decisionType unanimous decision
defendant Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. NERFINISHED
docketNumber 87-1252
holding A RICO pattern of racketeering activity requires proof of relationship among predicate acts and continuity of the racketeering activity, but does not require multiple schemes.
A single scheme can satisfy the RICO pattern requirement if the relationship and continuity requirements are met.
Predicate acts may form a RICO pattern if they amount to or pose a threat of continued criminal activity.
issue How to define continuity and relationship among predicate acts under RICO.
Whether multiple schemes are required to establish a RICO pattern of racketeering activity.
joinedByInMajority Antonin Scalia NERFINISHED
Byron R. White NERFINISHED
Harry A. Blackmun NERFINISHED
John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED
Sandra Day O'Connor NERFINISHED
Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED
William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED
jurisdiction federal question jurisdiction
keyword RICO pattern
continuity plus relationship test
racketeering activity
legalSubject Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act NERFINISHED
pattern of racketeering activity
lowerCourt United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit NERFINISHED
majorityOpinionBy William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED
plaintiff H.J. Inc. NERFINISHED
precedentFor interpretation of RICO pattern requirement in later federal cases
proceduralPosture On certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
relatedConcept closed-ended continuity
open-ended continuity
statuteInterpreted 18 U.S.C. § 1961
18 U.S.C. § 1962
voteDissent 0
voteMajority 9
yearDecided 1989

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) notableUseInCase H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
subject surface form: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act