Kirby v. Illinois
E912663
Kirby v. Illinois is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the Sixth Amendment right to counsel by holding it does not apply to pre-indictment identification procedures such as police lineups.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Kirby v. Illinois canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T11230701 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kirby v. Illinois Context triple: [Moore v. Illinois, relatedCase, Kirby v. Illinois]
-
A.
Scott v. Illinois
Scott v. Illinois is a 1979 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to appointed counsel applies only when a defendant is actually sentenced to imprisonment, thereby limiting the broader protections suggested in Argersinger v. Hamlin.
-
B.
Illinois v. Krull
Illinois v. Krull is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained by police relying on a statute later found unconstitutional.
-
C.
Bradwell v. Illinois
Bradwell v. Illinois is an 1873 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a state's right to bar women from practicing law, marking an early setback for women's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
D.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
E.
Moore v. Illinois
Moore v. Illinois is a United States Supreme Court decision addressing constitutional criminal procedure issues, particularly concerning the rights of defendants in state prosecutions.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kirby v. Illinois Target entity description: Kirby v. Illinois is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the Sixth Amendment right to counsel by holding it does not apply to pre-indictment identification procedures such as police lineups.
-
A.
Scott v. Illinois
Scott v. Illinois is a 1979 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to appointed counsel applies only when a defendant is actually sentenced to imprisonment, thereby limiting the broader protections suggested in Argersinger v. Hamlin.
-
B.
Illinois v. Krull
Illinois v. Krull is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained by police relying on a statute later found unconstitutional.
-
C.
Bradwell v. Illinois
Bradwell v. Illinois is an 1873 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a state's right to bar women from practicing law, marking an early setback for women's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
D.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
E.
Moore v. Illinois
Moore v. Illinois is a United States Supreme Court decision addressing constitutional criminal procedure issues, particularly concerning the rights of defendants in state prosecutions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Sixth Amendment case
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ criminal procedure case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
eyewitness identification
ⓘ
right to counsel ⓘ |
| citation | 406 U.S. 682 ⓘ |
| concurrenceBy |
William J. Brennan Jr.
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
William O. Douglas NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvision | Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decidedUnder | Sixth Amendment right to counsel doctrine ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1972 ⓘ |
| dissentBy |
Byron R. White
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED ⓘ William H. Rehnquist NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| distinguishedFrom |
Gilbert v. California
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Stovall v. Denno NERFINISHED ⓘ United States v. Wade NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| effect | Limited the scope of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel in identification procedures ⓘ |
| fullCaseName | Kirby v. Illinois NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| holding |
The Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not attach to pre-indictment identification procedures such as police lineups
ⓘ
The right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment attaches only at or after the initiation of adversary judicial criminal proceedings ⓘ |
| issue | Whether the Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies to pre-indictment police lineups ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalSubject |
constitutional law
ⓘ
criminal law ⓘ criminal procedure ⓘ |
| majorityBy | Potter Stewart NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| opinionType | plurality opinion ⓘ |
| page | 682 ⓘ |
| pluralityJustices |
Harry A. Blackmun
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Lewis F. Powell Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ Potter Stewart NERFINISHED ⓘ Warren E. Burger NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| precedentStatus | binding precedent in the United States federal courts ⓘ |
| proceduralPosture | Review of a state criminal conviction involving a pre-indictment lineup ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Escobedo v. Illinois
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Miranda v. Arizona NERFINISHED ⓘ United States v. Wade NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| result | Judgment of the Illinois courts affirmed ⓘ |
| subjectOf |
casebooks on criminal procedure
ⓘ
legal scholarship on the right to counsel ⓘ |
| term | 1971 Term ⓘ |
| timeframeOfEvents | pre-indictment stage of criminal proceedings ⓘ |
| volume | 406 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1972 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Kirby v. Illinois Description of subject: Kirby v. Illinois is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the Sixth Amendment right to counsel by holding it does not apply to pre-indictment identification procedures such as police lineups.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.